What's up with the sun?

[Sput]

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/ ... 797028.ece

We can only account for 4 per cent of the cosmos

By mass or by volume? That's not surprising either way due to (i) Dark matter and (ii) most of it hasn't been "unveiled" yet, because of the finite speed of light

Two spacecraft are flouting the laws of physics

I THINK that was solved but can't remember. I shall check later

Researchers have even given up trying to define what life is

It's one for the philosophers

NASA scientists found evidence for life on Mars. Then they changed their minds

Then it wasn't evidence for life. It was just dull and coincidental in appearance.

Your decisions are not your own

I think I've covered this

There remains some slim evidence that homeopathy works

Or that homeopathic remedies work? There's a difference. It's easy to get lucky, it's hard to explain why it's good.

[marksi]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/ ... o-a-planet

Every now and then a story comes along that seems to be true in spite of every cell in your brain telling you it can't be. Welcome to one of those stories.

In 2006, you'll remember that the International Astronomical Union announced that Pluto was to be expelled from the planetary club, reducing the number of planets in the solar system to eight. Cue mayhem in schools, where teachers were obliged to rip up wallcharts and console their pupils, who were understandably forlorn at the fate of their favourite planet.

In their wisdom, the IAU came up with a new class of heavenly body, "dwarf planet", which would include Pluto. Dwarf planets, incidentally, are not planets that are dwarfy. They are something completely different, the IAU said.

The new definition was such a kluge that the chair of the IAU's own planet definition committee, Owen Gingerich, said:

We now have dwarf planets which are in fact not planets. I consider this a linguistic catastrophe.

It seems that the insult to Pluto has been too much to bear for the good people of Illinois. State documents declare that Pluto was unfairly downgraded, and that the decision to demote the poor planet resulted from a vote involving only 4% of the IAU membership.

As such, the Illinois state governors have resolved to take action and reinstate Pluto as a planet. What's more, they have announced their intention to name Friday 13 March 2009 "Pluto Day", to mark its discovery in 1930 by Clyde Tombaugh, who happened to be born on a farm in the state.

It's all wonderful, if deeply baffling stuff. Why is this happening? Whatever your views on Pluto's rightful status, it's heartening to see that the fate of that small rock, and so the size of the solar system, is still up in the air.

RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE OF THE NINETY-SIXTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, that as Pluto passes overhead through Illinois’ night skies, that it be reestablished with full planetary status, and that March 13, 2009 be declared “Pluto Day” in the State of Illinois in honor of the date its discovery was announced in 1930.

[Nini]

This amuses me, it's sad yet they almost have a point.

[Sput]

I think the state legislature should be applauded for evidently having solved every other problem, meaning that they can get to such petty things as this.