in a roundabout way i suppose...Netizen wrote:Is it a ban on VGA resolution webcam pics making the place look untidy?
Those New Avatar Rules In Full
Flattery is your weak spot, JamezStuartPlymouth wrote:I thought you were rather proud of your looks, Jamez.Jamez wrote:I refuse to have an avatar.

User removed
I forgot the thread title for a moment...Nini wrote:Lovely, care to use a format most browsers recognise?

Of course, there is nothing to indicate that Jamez would remove his avatar in the near future. So it was, and is there, for you to see in page 1, Nini.
User removed
... Um, didn't you save it for posterity in a small time format usually reserved for clipart on the basis Jamez would remove it?
Compare with this.StuartPlymouth wrote:Of course, there is nothing to indicate that Jamez would remove his avatar in the near future. So it was, and is there, for you to see in page 1, Nini.
You're slipping further Stu.StuartPlymouth wrote:Flattery is your weak spot, JamezI wonder if you'll remove the avatar within hours? So for posterity, here it is:
No, I simply went back and did it again in JPEG. It had accidentally saved as EMF the first time because of something I had been doing earlier. I hadn't noticed the change, as it's not crucial to my well being.Nini wrote:... Um, didn't you save it for posterity in a small time format usually reserved for clipart on the basis Jamez would remove it?
(blurb)
You're slipping further Stu.
I'm not sure where you think I am slipping, but as long as it's not downhill towards you Nini, I don't mind.
User removed
Well done Nick, yes with the next site update (in about a week or so) all avatars must be converted to 16:9 and be 150px wide. (Specifically, 150x84px).Mr Q wrote:Will all avatars have to be in 16:9 widescreen format?
"He has to be larger than bacon"