Court acquits BNP scumbag.

Do you think the BNP should be outlawed?

Yes, definitely. The BNP are scum.
6
23%
I'm not sure. I think I'll sit on the fence.
4
15%
No. because I'm an evil racist shitbag too.
16
62%
 
Total votes: 26
DJGM
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 15.39
Location: Manchester
Contact:

One of the members of British Nazi Party (not a typo) has been acquitted of charges of inciting racial hatred.
Jury acquit BNP man of race hate

A jury at Leeds Crown Court has acquitted BNP activist Mark Collett of four racial hatred charges.

The jury is still considering its verdicts on another four charges and those against BNP leader Nick Griffin.

Mr Griffin, 44, and Mr Collett, 24, had denied using words intended to stir up hatred in West Yorkshire in 2004.
Read the full article at BBC News Online

If our justice system allows evil racist shitbags from the BNP to remain free, then our justice system stinks.

Image
Picture source: BBC News.

If only I could have the priceless chance to punch those smug fascist bastards in their worthless faces.
tvmercia
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat 10 Jan, 2004 03.15
Location: Low Birk Hatt

are you incapable of having a reasoned debate? you are very passionate about the subject, but what is the point of the thread if you are completely closed to any kind of discussion about the rights and wrongs of the case?
Dr Lobster*
Posts: 2123
Joined: Sat 30 Aug, 2003 20.14

i can't agree with this.

i don't agree with some of the tatics used by the bnp, but in the end, they must be allowed to have their freedom of expression just like we allow others in society (such as islamic fundamentalists) to have their own opinion and freedoms.

if our society isn't going to self-destruct in the next few years we are all going to have to learn to except people are going to hold views we personally find abhorant.

you said in your post that you'd like to punch those two men in the face because you don't like what they stand for.... is that really any different to what is going on in the middle east right now? not really. it's a different scale but it's two opposing views both thinking they are right.

we are all entitled to have our own opinions, racist, homophobic, xenophobic or whatever. that's free speech, that's a free and open society. we must all be mature enough accept that people will say and believe in things we don't like and not try to supress it in such a way we end up becoming no better than these destructive societies in the middle east which appear to be in a perpetual turmoil
User avatar
Gavin Scott
Admin
Posts: 6442
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

As Mr Mercia and Mark have said, polls worded in this fashion don't engender reasonable debate; and as we are a fairly broad church we have to allow people to respond to the options without having to cast themselves a "shitbag".

However unpalatable I find the philosophies of organisations which seek to separate human kind, I must accept that they exist, and do so because of the collective will of their membership.

I think laws concerning "incitement to racial hatred" are highly questionable at their core. It seems peculiar that the bnp can exist as a political party, while the words they use at meetings are an offense.

Everyone has free will. Just because I am told to hate someone doesn't make it so.

Commiting criminal acts is one thing. Saying hateful things is quite another.
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 7631
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.36
Location: Dundee

nodnirG kraM wrote:Image
Oh I like that one, very good.
"He has to be larger than bacon"
bobizgrate
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri 03 Feb, 2006 13.44
Location: London

Do you have any idea how cool teenagers find illegal things? Especially when they can't find out much about them because everyone refuses to discuss them sensibly.

The best way to destroy the BNP is to give them all the rope they need to hang themselves. Every time they call any of us, any politician, any of us, out for a debate, we take them on, and we show everyone how stupid they are. We have the arguments, and we will win. They will lie, about spurious documents they have received from their sources, and various conversations they've had with senior policemen, so you call their bluff. You show everyone they are wrong, and you win.

Making them illegal makes them into something of a "sub-culture" and therefore attractive to some. To beat them, we have to let them go free and make knobs of themselves trying to argue with us forever. We'll never get that opportunity while they're the sole voice heard by the ill-educated in prison.
User avatar
Gavin Scott
Admin
Posts: 6442
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

bobizgrate wrote:Do you have any idea how cool teenagers find illegal things? Especially when they can't find out much about them because everyone refuses to discuss them sensibly.

The best way to destroy the BNP is to give them all the rope they need to hang themselves. Every time they call any of us, any politician, any of us, out for a debate, we take them on, and we show everyone how stupid they are. We have the arguments, and we will win. They will lie, about spurious documents they have received from their sources, and various conversations they've had with senior policemen, so you call their bluff. You show everyone they are wrong, and you win.

Making them illegal makes them into something of a "sub-culture" and therefore attractive to some. To beat them, we have to let them go free and make knobs of themselves trying to argue with us forever. We'll never get that opportunity while they're the sole voice heard by the ill-educated in prison.
Some very intersting points.
huddsguy
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat 24 Jul, 2004 19.20

bobizgrate wrote:Do you have any idea how cool teenagers find illegal things? Especially when they can't find out much about them because everyone refuses to discuss them sensibly.

The best way to destroy the BNP is to give them all the rope they need to hang themselves. Every time they call any of us, any politician, any of us, out for a debate, we take them on, and we show everyone how stupid they are. We have the arguments, and we will win. They will lie, about spurious documents they have received from their sources, and various conversations they've had with senior policemen, so you call their bluff. You show everyone they are wrong, and you win.

Making them illegal makes them into something of a "sub-culture" and therefore attractive to some. To beat them, we have to let them go free and make knobs of themselves trying to argue with us forever. We'll never get that opportunity while they're the sole voice heard by the ill-educated in prison.
Similarly by the media ignoring or constantly attacking them, you create a situation where they become attractive because they're 'underground' and mysterious.

If you broadcast their views, most people will be able to judge for themselves, they become a normal political grouping and, as has been said, shoot themselves in the foot.

It doesn't need any sort of media boycott or constant bashing by journalists - they can implode quite happily by themselves - if you let them have that rope.
Dr Lobster*
Posts: 2123
Joined: Sat 30 Aug, 2003 20.14

Image

what does djgm think of the above snippet?

would you like to punch any of these people in the face?
Jamez
Banned
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sun 30 May, 2004 23.02
Location: Bristol

ISLAM IS A LOAD OF SHIT BASED UPON SOME HAIRY PROPHET WHO HAD LICE IN HIS BEARD.

Death to all muslims.

See how they like it...
User Removed
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

Jamez mate, that's unbelievably out of line!
Knight knight
Please Respond