No, no, no, no, no.Gavin Scott wrote:And a vanilla slice.
A WHOLE vanilla sponge, if you please.
I need to increase my sugar levels to feed my anger.
No, no, no, no, no.Gavin Scott wrote:And a vanilla slice.
Hello Gavin my darling,Gavin Scott wrote:As I was the original author of said thread, I demand an explanation.
Ten-a-penny idiots have their threads left in place or, at best, locked and left on the board.
Why was mine removed from sight?
Ison - as the representative from the TV Forum portakabin, please report to Metropol Towers with an explanation.
And a vanilla slice - if you are passing a Greggs.
Whilst I wouldn't normally respond to this thread I wish to set the record straight on the reason I gave for moving the topic from public view. The above quote post is not my exact words, and is to an extent misleading in regards to what I said.Isonstine wrote:Hello Gavin my darling,
The thread seems to have been removed from the forum for a reason that Charlie Wells says the thread was nothing more than a chance for members to have a potshot at the adminstration.
I don't approve.
...and...It has absolutely nothing to do with the original topic, and I suspect in part an attempt to stir things up.
My comments did NOT imply that "the thread was nothing more than a chance for members to have a potshot at the adminstration", as that suggests I was referring to the entire thread when my comments reffered the recent attempts to dig up/revive an old thread.This way the discussion is not lost, but hopefully deters some unnecessary mod bashing. The issue regarding train pics is in the past, in part simply because those obsessed with posting the pics have stopped.
Any explanation as to why you, "wouldn't normally respond" to this type of thread? Pardon me for saying Charlie, but if you are going to take on the role of Moderator, you might at least have the courtesy of responding to the membership's general enquiries.Charlie Wells wrote:Whilst I wouldn't normally respond to this thread I wish to set the record straight on the reason I gave for moving the topic from public view.
Explain how the discussion is "not lost" now you have deleted the topic?This way the discussion is not lost, but hopefully deters some unnecessary mod bashing. The issue regarding train pics is in the past, in part simply because those obsessed with posting the pics have stopped.
I thought the phrase "mod bashing" spoke for itself.My comments did NOT imply that "the thread was nothing more than a chance for members to have a potshot at the adminstration", as that suggests I was referring to the entire thread when my comments reffered the recent attempts to dig up/revive an old thread.
The "diplomatic silence" seems to be something you yourself are keen to keep up. Hence saying you "wouldn't normally reply".A final request to Isonstine, if you have issue with decision which I make and announced in the Mod section of TVForum I suggest you raise issue about it in the mod section of TVForum or contact Asa, instead of taking a diplomatic silence.
As the one who replied to the thread (which Charles refers to as "an attempt to stir things up") let me reply to that.Charlie Wells wrote: My exact words made in the mods section were...It has absolutely nothing to do with the original topic, and I suspect in part an attempt to stir things up.This way the discussion is not lost, but hopefully deters some unnecessary mod bashing. The issue regarding train pics is in the past, in part simply because those obsessed with posting the pics have stopped.
And who says I don't consider you a heap of steaming donkey droppings?James H wrote:Who says I didn't mean Mr. Harvey