johnnyboy wrote:The same could probably have been said about the different communities in the Troubles in Northern Ireland, and support for the militants "representing" them.Death By Spreadsheet wrote:The recent YouGov Poll for the Telegraph showed that 24% of responses (all Muslims) sympathised with the motives and feelings of the bombers, whilst not directly supporting their methods.
Given this, I am not sure your rationale in respect of the proportion of bombers per ethnic/religious group is an accurate measurement of any threat, perceived or otherwise.
That doesn't mean they all turned into bombers, did it?
So, my rationale is fine, thanks.
My point was that you can't judge the 'threat' by the number of bombers who carried out the various acts as you appeared to suggest.
The use of Northern Ireland as an example is a good one. The terrorists had a great deal of support for many years. The troubles lasted decades. Hundreds died.