and suddenly the waters become clearer....J.Christie wrote:I'm only 13
I've only ever been with Orange which was good for me unlike how it was for Nick Harvey. I know this as we just had half of this discussion a while back.
and suddenly the waters become clearer....J.Christie wrote:I'm only 13
There would only be 2 things that would attract me to 3.....J.Christie wrote:What the fuck are you on about?
Hold it, hold it! Who voted "3"? Honestly!
Personally I couldn't care for 3. The whole idea of video calling sounds stupid - are you seriously going to walk down the street holding the phone at arms length whilst talking?nwtv2003 wrote:There would only be 2 things that would attract me to 3.....J.Christie wrote:What the fuck are you on about?
Hold it, hold it! Who voted "3"? Honestly!
1) Video News from ITN (Handy when you can't catch it on TV)
2) Premier League Highlights from 5.15pm most Saturdays...
I know a couple of people who had 3, but they got rid of it, poor signals even though you can get a good signal in most built-up areas, and the phones weren't great either.
3 is like On Digital, a good idea on paper, but crap on screen due to poor testing and maximising with a little amount of space.
It was said so, because if you get it incorrect, the person gets frustrated and then has to go throught the whole saying again, struggling.johnnyboy wrote:I was once told that the most insulting thing you can do to a stammerer is complete his/her sentences when he/she is trying to get a word out. Hence, I never do it. Is that correct?
Apparently alot of people went onto "3" for the cheaper calls & wern't even using video call, even if they were calling someone who also had a "3" mobile because they said they knew it would be harder to lie on the phoneChris wrote:Personally I couldn't care for 3. The whole idea of video calling sounds stupid - are you seriously going to walk down the street holding the phone at arms length whilst talking?nwtv2003 wrote:There would only be 2 things that would attract me to 3.....J.Christie wrote:What the fuck are you on about?
Hold it, hold it! Who voted "3"? Honestly!
1) Video News from ITN (Handy when you can't catch it on TV)
2) Premier League Highlights from 5.15pm most Saturdays...
I know a couple of people who had 3, but they got rid of it, poor signals even though you can get a good signal in most built-up areas, and the phones weren't great either.
3 is like On Digital, a good idea on paper, but crap on screen due to poor testing and maximising with a little amount of space.
Plus, who wants to watch TV or any form of video on a tiny screen with a bad picture quality and dreadful audio fidelity?
I'm sure JB won't "bite" when I moan about Three's constant marketing calls -- I get one every couple of days or so, and it always seems to be the same bloody person insisting I change to their silly little network.johnnyboy wrote:3 are a total nightmare, in my experience.
The call centre is completely unhelpful, and the 3G and 2G signals in my area were ropey to say the least.
And the handset was crap.