New iPod Nano

jsm
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu 13 Dec, 2007 22.45
Location: New York

It's that time of year again, with Steve Job's obnoxious keynote, unveiling updated iPods. Usually I'm indifferent, but this year some of the changes are utterly absurd.

iPod Nano 2009: Image
iPod Nano 2010: Image

Case in point, the iPod Nano. Last year the nano was updated with a video camera and FM radio, along with the typical audio/video playback. However, this year it has been reduced to the size of a Shuffle, with a minuscule touch screen, while eliminating video playback, the video camera, and the scroll wheel. Admittedly, I wouldn't want to watch a video on a 1.5 inch screen, but this is definitely a case of form reducing the functionality of a device, especially when the device is the same price as the previous generation.

I don't think the device itself is awful, but I think it should have replaced the iPod Shuffle. I think I'll find myself hanging on to my trusty 5th Generation iPod, especially because it looks like the Classic is being phased out.

I don't really know why I find this irritating, what are your thoughts?
jsm
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu 13 Dec, 2007 22.45
Location: New York

Apparently it's a skinned version of the old software, with a bit of multitouch from iOS thrown on top.

Edit: Also, if it was the size of, let's say the 3rd Generation Nano, all screen of course, it would have been much better.
User avatar
LaSeandre
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat 03 Nov, 2007 12.14
Location: Everywhere. And nowhere.

What in god's name would you need multi-touch on a 1.5" screen for anyway? It's utterly ridiculous, I think I'll be hanging onto my Nano 4G now, tbh. Either that, or get a Touch.
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

jsm wrote:It's that time of year again, with Steve Job's obnoxious keynote, unveiling updated iPods.
Yeah, who does he think he is, ANNOUNCING products and BRAGGING about success, an American CEO or something?

Makes me sick to my stomach.
Knight knight
jsm
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu 13 Dec, 2007 22.45
Location: New York

Believe me, I'm not completely against Apple-I have a Mac, but surely one must find it strange that there seems to be a cult of personality centered around his products and Jobs himself. Where else are CEO's keynotes covered on TV Newscasts (presumably just here on the US)? What it comes down to is the fact that iPods are consumer products-good products at that, but they're still just devices, and nothing more than that.
User avatar
iSon
Moderator
Posts: 1635
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 23.24
Location: London

jsm wrote:Believe me, I'm not completely against Apple-I have a Mac, but surely one must find it strange that there seems to be a cult of personality centered around his products and Jobs himself. Where else are CEO's keynotes covered on TV Newscasts (presumably just here on the US)? What it comes down to is the fact that iPods are consumer products-good products at that, but they're still just devices, and nothing more than that.
Surely the desire for the media to cover Apple's product launches is a sign of Apple's success rather than it's failure. After all, considering all the free advertising it gets - Steve Jobs is hardly going to say "Oh no...don't turn up. I'll just issue a press release with some pictures. It launches next week."

At the end of the day - love or loathe them, Apple reach a lot of people and the amount of people in the UK that has a product created by them is surely rather high? I'm not saying every move they make should be covered but why else should it be different that Apple gets coverage to when Microsoft release a new version of Windows or Virgin Media up the speed of their broadband. It also doesn't hurt that Apple deliberately makes these events very media friendly, while releasing precious little else beforehand - this ensures that the big boys will be there to find out and make sure they're not missing out on anything.
Good Lord!
User avatar
Gavin Scott
Admin
Posts: 6442
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

I must admit, I sort of feel the same way about the Apple machine and the fuss over product launches.

Successful, sure; but I tend to believe its an engineered event to launch revised products that contain improvements they probably could have released with their earlier models.

Call me a cynic...
Jake
Posts: 216
Joined: Tue 27 Jun, 2006 13.00
Location: Derbyshire

A friend of mine bought me a Nano this summer. I'm glad he bought it when he did, not impressed by this update.
The new touches are nice, as are the shuffles, but the nano doesn't quite sit right with me.

I do like my 5G one though.
User avatar
DVB Cornwall
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 21.42

I love the look of the new one, but wholly agree with the comments here, the Nano name should have been dropped and a new type name used for the new model.

Must admit though the iPod touch is now quite a beast and is tempting me. I can't really justify based on my call volumes an iPhone.
Image
Inspector Sands
Posts: 369
Joined: Wed 25 Aug, 2004 00.37
Location: London

Gavin Scott wrote:I must admit, I sort of feel the same way about the Apple machine and the fuss over product launches.

Successful, sure; but I tend to believe its an engineered event to launch revised products that contain improvements they probably could have released with their earlier models.
I noticed that the beeb were running a report today about iPad rivals being launched in Berlin, in particular the Samsung Galaxy tablet. It made a nice change from the usual 'there is nothing else but Apple' approach

Of course it has all the things that people complain are missing on an iPad such as a camera, but of course when Apple finally catch up in 6 months time it will get far more publicity.
Inspector Sands
Posts: 369
Joined: Wed 25 Aug, 2004 00.37
Location: London

LaSeandre wrote:What in god's name would you need multi-touch on a 1.5" screen for anyway? It's utterly ridiculous, I think I'll be hanging onto my Nano 4G now, tbh. Either that, or get a Touch.
The mention of multitouch got a big cheer too, bizarre
Please Respond