Wenlock and Mandeville

Inspector Sands
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed 25 Aug, 2004 00.37
Location: London

... are the Olympic and Paralympic mascots for 2012 and I think they're actually quite good, which after the logo is pleasing. A nice little animated back-story too: http://www.london2012.com/mascots

Some nice touches, the names (Much Wenlock and Stoke Mandeville being important places in Olympic and Paralympic history), the Olympic rings around Wenlock's arms and the London taxi-styling on his head
Jovis
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri 25 Aug, 2006 20.08

I like the logo!

Sorry, I keep saying that.
Inspector Sands
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed 25 Aug, 2004 00.37
Location: London

Jovis wrote:I like the logo!
I must say I've come round to it a bit, but that's mainly just because I've got used to it. I thought the version they used during Beijing with a Union Flag background worked a lot better than the normal one
User avatar
madmusician
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon 11 Dec, 2006 19.11
Location: Worcester, UK

I was a bit "whoah!" at first, but after watching the video, I find them very cute. And Morpurgo's an excellent story teller. They remind me of Bing and Bong a bit. Only query is how they'll do them inside the stadiums?
Jovis
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri 25 Aug, 2006 20.08

Like this I imagine...

Image
User avatar
DVB Cornwall
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 21.42

Mischevous Paxman, dubbing them as Nick and Dave. (The colour scheme is uncanny)
Image
Chie
Posts: 979
Joined: Fri 31 Aug, 2007 05.03

I thought they were shit (well, more like blobs of seminal fluid, really) until I saw this:

Image

...and I now think they're fantastic. Those infantile romper suit incarnations in the publicity shots simply don't do them justice.

It's just a shame about the naff logo and that rotting carcass sculpture, as well as the visual vomit of the stadium livery and the conspicuous absence of the official Olympic rings. But yeah, the mascots are great.
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

Chie wrote: the conspicuous absence of the official Olympic rings.
huh?
Image
Knight knight
User avatar
Cache
Posts: 269
Joined: Sun 16 Mar, 2008 17.19
Location: London

I do like them rather a lot.
I do also like the stadium to be honest, having seen it up close last month, it's better than I expected.

Only two more years!
Chie
Posts: 979
Joined: Fri 31 Aug, 2007 05.03

Sput wrote:
Chie wrote: the conspicuous absence of the official Olympic rings.
huh?
http://www.london2012.com/games/mascots ... ascots.jpg
I meant the colour rings.
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 7629
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.36
Location: Dundee

Chie wrote:
Sput wrote:
Chie wrote: the conspicuous absence of the official Olympic rings.
huh?
http://www.london2012.com/games/mascots ... ascots.jpg
I meant the colour rings.
Well that would be a visual disaster putting them on all the various coloured logos. Anyhow one of the mascots has all the colours on their arm as bracelets.
"He has to be larger than bacon"
Please Respond