Page 1 of 2

Wenlock and Mandeville

Posted: Wed 19 May, 2010 19.46
by Inspector Sands
... are the Olympic and Paralympic mascots for 2012 and I think they're actually quite good, which after the logo is pleasing. A nice little animated back-story too: http://www.london2012.com/mascots

Some nice touches, the names (Much Wenlock and Stoke Mandeville being important places in Olympic and Paralympic history), the Olympic rings around Wenlock's arms and the London taxi-styling on his head

Re: Wenlock and Mandeville

Posted: Wed 19 May, 2010 20.01
by Jovis
I like the logo!

Sorry, I keep saying that.

Re: Wenlock and Mandeville

Posted: Wed 19 May, 2010 20.05
by Inspector Sands
Jovis wrote:I like the logo!
I must say I've come round to it a bit, but that's mainly just because I've got used to it. I thought the version they used during Beijing with a Union Flag background worked a lot better than the normal one

Re: Wenlock and Mandeville

Posted: Wed 19 May, 2010 20.11
by madmusician
I was a bit "whoah!" at first, but after watching the video, I find them very cute. And Morpurgo's an excellent story teller. They remind me of Bing and Bong a bit. Only query is how they'll do them inside the stadiums?

Re: Wenlock and Mandeville

Posted: Wed 19 May, 2010 20.22
by Jovis
Like this I imagine...

Image

Re: Wenlock and Mandeville

Posted: Wed 19 May, 2010 23.31
by DVB Cornwall
Mischevous Paxman, dubbing them as Nick and Dave. (The colour scheme is uncanny)

Re: Wenlock and Mandeville

Posted: Thu 20 May, 2010 05.36
by Chie
I thought they were shit (well, more like blobs of seminal fluid, really) until I saw this:

Image

...and I now think they're fantastic. Those infantile romper suit incarnations in the publicity shots simply don't do them justice.

It's just a shame about the naff logo and that rotting carcass sculpture, as well as the visual vomit of the stadium livery and the conspicuous absence of the official Olympic rings. But yeah, the mascots are great.

Re: Wenlock and Mandeville

Posted: Thu 20 May, 2010 08.12
by Sput
Chie wrote: the conspicuous absence of the official Olympic rings.
huh?
Image

Re: Wenlock and Mandeville

Posted: Thu 20 May, 2010 08.14
by Cache
I do like them rather a lot.
I do also like the stadium to be honest, having seen it up close last month, it's better than I expected.

Only two more years!

Re: Wenlock and Mandeville

Posted: Thu 20 May, 2010 08.24
by Chie
Sput wrote:
Chie wrote: the conspicuous absence of the official Olympic rings.
huh?
http://www.london2012.com/games/mascots ... ascots.jpg
I meant the colour rings.

Re: Wenlock and Mandeville

Posted: Thu 20 May, 2010 08.57
by Pete
Chie wrote:
Sput wrote:
Chie wrote: the conspicuous absence of the official Olympic rings.
huh?
http://www.london2012.com/games/mascots ... ascots.jpg
I meant the colour rings.
Well that would be a visual disaster putting them on all the various coloured logos. Anyhow one of the mascots has all the colours on their arm as bracelets.