Temporary speed cameras

Dr Lobster*
Posts: 2123
Joined: Sat 30 Aug, 2003 20.14

there has been some 'bridge strengthening works' going on down a stretch of the a47 which i sadly have to cross to get to work - it's been going on for a few months and whilst the works were going on about six 'specs' speed cameras were installed, although they were removed overnight yesterday and no trace of them ever being there exists.

Image

these cameras, as you probably know work by taking timestamped photographs of your car and then working out your average speed by calculating how long it takes you to get from the first camera to the second.

but i am not completely convinced these temporary cameras functioned. not much information is published about how these cameras actually work - there was clearly no cable running between them so i can't see how they could be reliably synchronised - surely a pre-requisite if you're perform a time critical calculation?

does anybody 'in the know' know how these cameras are synchronised? it was the lack of visible cables running between cameras sites which made me suspicious that they were just there for show.
cdd
Posts: 2621
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 14.05

Maybe they just get the time from a trusted time server? I don't see why they need to be synchronised to each other, only to a correct (well, not correct so much as constant) time source.
User avatar
Ebeneezer Scrooge
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue 23 Sep, 2003 13.53
Location: Scrooge Towers

...or maybe using GPS for time sync - I assume they must be fairly geo-aware anyway for the system to work, so a frame accurate clock would be a handy by-product.

If that's not how they work, does anyone fancy going into business? I've got a great idea for a GPS based speed trap system!
Snarky
User avatar
marksi
Posts: 1892
Joined: Wed 07 Jan, 2004 05.38
Location: Donaghadee

GPS would provide them with timestamps.

Oh. Like what he said.

I've noticed that on the stretch of road home that benefitted from the SPECS cameras over about 6 miles, the traffic is increasing its speed back up to near what it was before, which suggests they are set well above the actual speed limit.
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

I'd have thought the easiest solution was using the cellular network to get times and just ensure the distance between the cameras is known. No point in making it fancier than it needs to be.
Knight knight
cdd
Posts: 2621
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 14.05

Go on Sput, you're a scientist: let's have a plausible explanation that'll hold up in a court of law for how we travelled from Camera A to Camera B without speeding!
Stuart*
Banned
Posts: 2150
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 10.31
Location: Devon

cdd wrote:Go on Sput, you're a scientist
That's wrong, apparently, so is praising Mr Q's financial acumen.
Tsk at you (by Gav's rules)
User removed
barcode
Posts: 1515
Joined: Wed 29 Aug, 2007 19.36

Those cameras have been on the A77 for about 4 years now around Prestwick section, There have been able to help cut the accidents rate, and help slow down traffic .
Stuart*
Banned
Posts: 2150
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 10.31
Location: Devon

barcode wrote:Those cameras have been on the A77 for about 4 years now around Prestwick section, There have been able to help cut the accidents rate, and help slow down traffic .
the 'universal translater' said " $%"! "
User removed
cdd
Posts: 2621
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 14.05

i have become confused by your posts stuart. Should i interpret them as ironic, sarcastic, matter-of-fact, bitchy, bitter, sour grapes or just general weird aimless shoot-anywhere ranting?
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

cdd wrote:Go on Sput, you're a scientist: let's have a plausible explanation that'll hold up in a court of law for how we travelled from Camera A to Camera B without speeding!
Well it's simple really, all you have to do is travel from camera A to camera B without exceeding the speed limit.

You didn't put a time limit on the journey :P
Knight knight
Please Respond