Re-using stamps

cdd
Posts: 2621
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 14.05

Have any of you ever re-used unstamped stamps from incoming mail? Sure, it's the height of pettiness, but..

It's amazing how few stamps get canceled properly - I'd say about one in 20 have no markings to indicate the stamp is canceled.

I don't see how they're able to distinguish stamps removed from letters that have been through the mail, from stamps that are mistakenly placed on envelopes and peeled off again (I presume, a perfectly legal act).

As it happens, though, I think the postal workers really couldn't care less. As part of a bet with someone, I posted myself an anonymous letter which was "stamped" with a very badly photocopied, very badly cut out, black and white grainy 1st-class stamp. To my amazement it arrived with no problems whatsoever (it did have some stranger than usual markings where they stamp over the stamp - maybe it was done manually or some such). I was actually rather disappointed. :(
Stuart*
Banned
Posts: 2150
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 10.31
Location: Devon

I don't think many people would really go to the lengths of re-using a stamp to save themselves 29p (or whatever 1st class is now). Royal Mail probably assume the same and don't expend resources tracking down offenders. I'm sure they only check letters/parcels which require postage above the standard rate.

When the books of 'pre-glued' stamps were first trialled more that a decade ago it was discovered that not only could they be easily peeled off envelopes and re-used, but that the coating on the front allowed the franking mark to be rubbed off. Stamps could therefore be used many times. They were hurriedly recalled and the coating and adhesive changed.
User removed
Stuart*
Banned
Posts: 2150
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 10.31
Location: Devon

nodnirG kraM wrote:36p
Well, I never know these days because I buy them in books and the stamps just say '1st' on them :?
User removed
Nini
Banned
Posts: 1617
Joined: Fri 19 Oct, 2007 17.14

How's them first pence pieces holding out for you these days, Stu?
Please Respond