Page 9 of 15

Posted: Sat 07 Jan, 2006 15.55
by James H
*Charlie*

Posted: Sat 07 Jan, 2006 18.41
by Pete
how do you know that? did he reply to your rtp?

Posted: Sat 07 Jan, 2006 18.49
by James H
He replied to yours

Posted: Sat 07 Jan, 2006 19.08
by Nick Harvey
In memory:-

Image

Posted: Sat 07 Jan, 2006 20.14
by Sput
Image

Surely?!

Posted: Sat 07 Jan, 2006 23.26
by Square Eyes
Do we not even get the courtesy of an explanation from the soderators anymore when locking threads ?

I do consider it very rude when there are many of us who have actively followed Bens website for many months.

Do we really need nannying by Chastity Charlie ?

Posted: Mon 09 Jan, 2006 18.43
by Gavin Scott
I'm utterly dumbfounded that "End-the-TV-Licence" is allowed his THIRD incarnation on TV Forum.

I've reported the post and questioned the user myself as to why he feels he has returned.

I have been spectacularly ignored on both fronts.

I'm really hacked off at the inconsistent approach to moderation on the board.

Who gives a toss what a 13 year old thinks of a Licence he doesn't pay?

Why am I being ignored by the moderators?

Posted: Mon 09 Jan, 2006 18.50
by James H
It appears that the site's moderators (well, apart from Ison) feel you're one of the "clique" who constantly complain and bitch about the site, Gavin. And poor little Charlie can't have people complaining about the site can he now.

Posted: Mon 09 Jan, 2006 18.52
by Gavin Scott
James H wrote:It appears that the site's moderators (well, apart from Ison) feel you're one of the "clique" who constantly complain and bitch about the site, Gavin.
Is this true Charlie/Asa? Am I considered nothing more than a pest after all these years?

Posted: Mon 09 Jan, 2006 19.11
by Sput
I've had a thought. Asa started TVH and then TVF, which took off like nobody's business. That'll surely give anyone an ego boost if they ran it. Perhaps, therefore, he doesn't give a damn about WHAT is posted on the board, so long as SOMETHING is posted on the board and that it has thousands of members in a true ego-maintaining "quality not quantity" sense?

Perhaps our whistleblower (that'll be you, Ison) could tell us what the policy is on encouraging as many people to post as possible, regardless of whether they're capable of rational thought.

Posted: Mon 09 Jan, 2006 19.16
by Charlie Wells
Gavin Scott wrote:
James H wrote:It appears that the site's moderators (well, apart from Ison) feel you're one of the "clique" who constantly complain and bitch about the site, Gavin.
Is this true Charlie/Asa? Am I considered nothing more than a pest after all these years?
Simple answer: No, and I have no idea where James has got that idea from.

Unfortunately there is no conclusive proof such as a matching IP address or matching email address. Though for the record you're not the only person who has suspected that the user may have had past incarnations, and there is one open RTP on the matter. As far as I can tell since this report was opened ALL moderators and admin have been online since and therefore would have seen it, just incase anyone was wondering.