Metropol

Meh. As good a time as any for me to swap to a pic with specs...

Chie wrote:Hmph.

Now I'm wondering if I should even bother with an avatar at all.

Upto you sonny jim. Might want to take one using a camera instead of a webcam if you decide to continue down the avatar route, the blue pallor does your highly reflective face no favours as you know too well.

Nini wrote:Ooh, very classy Dave.

Except for some reason now Dave looks older than me.

Or is it just me?

I like these new standardised corporate avatars. Makes cross-promotion much easier.

I think they look a lot cleaner in 16:9.

marksi wrote:

Nini wrote:Ooh, very classy Dave.

Except for some reason now Dave looks older than me.

Or is it just me?

That was taken 5 years ago - so HUMPH!

They cover the on-line text as well now. what about our unfortunate readers who need to see the full text to understand the meaning.

Hmmm. So if I change mine for one taken 5 years ago you'll look EVEN older than me. Yay.

It's just a overlap thing - it'll be gone in little while, like 'stereo', or 'subtitles'... oh....

I'll have to take a new photo tomorrow as this one's dead old, but my UKTV stylee avatar will do for now. It's good enough for a 10 channel network, it's good enough for me.

Jovis wrote:It's just a overlap thing - it'll be gone in little while, like 'stereo', or 'subtitles'... oh....

Yeah. Best rid of them. Better than sticking pointless information in a stupid position of prominence. Don't think anyone would do that.

Or would they?

I decided not only to join the 16:9 revolution, but to go COLOUR as well...