Metropol

rts wrote:

Dusty Jacket wrote:As you wish, Sir.

You obviously know little about the Honours system.

It's just a good thing The Queen doesn't hold the same views as James 'The Racist' Astella.

nodnirG kraM wrote:

Dusty Jacket wrote:

rts wrote: You obviously know little about the Honours system.

It's just a good thing The Queen doesn't hold the same views as James 'The Racist' Astella.

Know the Queen personally, do you?

Yep. I mean, The Queen let her daugher-in-law marry an al-Fayed, didn't she?

The al-Fayeds' and the Singhs' are one and the same. How do you think he managed to swing a knighthood?

nodnirG kraM wrote:The ex wife of her son... I shouldn't think she'd have too much influence over her bedfellows.

The rabbit hole goes a lot deeper than you think, my son.

Dusty Jacket wrote:

nodnirG kraM wrote:

Dusty Jacket wrote: It's just a good thing The Queen doesn't hold the same views as James 'The Racist' Astella.

Know the Queen personally, do you?

Yep. I mean, The Queen let her daugher-in-law marry an al-Fayed, didn't she?

The al-Fayeds' and the Singhs' are one and the same. How do you think he managed to swing a knighthood?

I think you're mistaken Dusty.I don't recall Diana marrying Dodi.

Dusty Jacket wrote:Yep. I mean, The Queen let her daugher-in-law marry an al-Fayed, didn't she?

The al-Fayeds' and the Singhs' are one and the same. How do you think he managed to swing a knighthood?

What the fuck?! One the whole basis' for conspiracy theories is that Diana was killed so she couldn't marry an al'Fayed. The Queen most certainly did not 'allow' Diana to marry an al'Fayed.

As for your comment about the al'Fayeds and the Singhs, I'll turn a blind eye to that.

Looks like I'm not the only 'racist' on this website!

Dusty Jacket wrote:The rabbit hole goes a lot deeper than you think, my son.

I'm not sure about all that lizard nonsense, but I have feeling one member of this forum is a trout.

Facinating as this is - I'm more convined the only standard around here is one of prefering people who actually post good stuff instead of midless drivvel such as j.christie or wierdos who post crap and photoshop their photos like CraigF / Dusty Jacket

Hymagumba wrote:Facinating as this is - I'm more convined the only standard around here is one of prefering people who actually post good stuff instead of midless drivvel such as j.christie or wierdos who post crap and photoshop their photos like CraigF / Dusty Jacket

Oh, I agree.

There are quite a few dysfunctional bullies on this forum. Your behaviour here mirrors your real life persona:

Hymagumba wrote:destroyed school property

bullied loads of kids. some of them to the verge of tears (but only the ones that deserved it)

threw a bottle of bright red fizzy pop over someone's washing

and I think I keyed a car once

I can only assume you have been raped one or more times by a family member to have ended up like this. You are a damaged human being - but ridicule people like Cristie and Craig F if you must.

I highlighted the 'but only the ones that deserved it', because i felt it apt.

Dusty Jacket wrote:I can only assume you have been raped one or more times by a family member to have ended up like this

I think you are mistaking me for max and his daddy of porn empire fame.