Re: Sad Luddite Freaks
Posted: Mon 15 Sep, 2008 09.44
Ah, obvious really.
Am I doin it rite?
Am I doin it rite?
Page 3 of 23
Re: Sad Luddite Freaks
Posted: Mon 15 Sep, 2008 09.54
no shatliffing will be one of the rules (which will be explained this afternoon)
Re: Sad Luddite Freaks
Posted: Mon 15 Sep, 2008 10.31
Hm, 16:9 avatars, sure we won't be complaining how it doesn't allow much headroom or for good framing much like Parky did when it first started being used widely on TV?
Re: Those New Avatar Rules In Full
Posted: Mon 15 Sep, 2008 20.40
Q>> Do we need to take account of safe areas for those without appropriate televisions?
Re: Those New Avatar Rules In Full
Posted: Mon 15 Sep, 2008 20.50
I've got some spare ARCs knocking about. The use of some of the zoom modes can improve dodgy haircuts.
Re: Those New Avatar Rules In Full
Posted: Mon 15 Sep, 2008 20.59
Is this acceptable boys and girls? x
Re: Those New Avatar Rules In Full
Posted: Mon 15 Sep, 2008 21.01
ARE YOU REFERRING TO MY HAIR?marksi wrote:The use of some of the zoom modes can improve dodgy haircuts.
Never have I been so insulted in all my life. I'm still recovering from being called a Blackadder Extra.
I should add that I am interested in all hair improving measures.
Re: Those New Avatar Rules In Full
Posted: Mon 15 Sep, 2008 21.07
no, it must be 85 high, not 100.James H wrote:Is this acceptable boys and girls? x
Re: Those New Avatar Rules In Full
Posted: Mon 15 Sep, 2008 21.12
He's bought one of those dodgy 15:9 Korean tellys by the looks of it.Hymagumba wrote:no, it must be 85 high, not 100.James H wrote:Is this acceptable boys and girls? x
Re: Those New Avatar Rules In Full
Posted: Mon 15 Sep, 2008 21.13
I hope my one is acceptable.
It's a bit dark...
It's a bit dark...
Re: Those New Avatar Rules In Full
Posted: Mon 15 Sep, 2008 21.14
well, it would be, but we've not launched the new site yet (clue, in about 45 mins) and it needs to be 150 x 85, a size that the current software won't allow