Well the new one doesn't work either so they'd have been no worse off. The twitter avatars are hideous.thegeek wrote: Mon 15 Jan, 2018 06.40I believe they tried mocks with the Egyptian masthead and tabloid sizes in the past and couldn't get it to work.Alexia wrote: Sun 14 Jan, 2018 23.00 Also not really seeing the need for a separate masthead font. That's three fonts they're now using in general circulation. Also the black-on-white is....boring.
Another High Street Rebrand
"He has to be larger than bacon"
Agreed. I wonder if the black-on-white is a further cost saving exercise? Or perhaps there's a hope internally that paper sales will drop further and in 9 months they can say 'well, we tried' and do an Independent?Pete wrote: Mon 15 Jan, 2018 07.48Well the new one doesn't work either so they'd have been no worse off. The twitter avatars are hideous.thegeek wrote: Mon 15 Jan, 2018 06.40I believe they tried mocks with the Egyptian masthead and tabloid sizes in the past and couldn't get it to work.Alexia wrote: Sun 14 Jan, 2018 23.00 Also not really seeing the need for a separate masthead font. That's three fonts they're now using in general circulation. Also the black-on-white is....boring.
Either way, the website looks much worse and much less distinctive than before.
There may be a slight issue with the positioning of the masthead…
https://twitter.com/fast_philosophy/sta ... 2340209664
https://twitter.com/fast_philosophy/sta ... 2340209664
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Sat 25 Jun, 2016 15.42
Wouldn't the Old Masthead have had a similar issue as that was Justified on the right
But as the paper was larger it would have been folded on its side.sqwidge1978 wrote: Tue 16 Jan, 2018 15.25 Wouldn't the Old Masthead have had a similar issue as that was Justified on the right
- tillyoshea
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sun 23 Nov, 2003 14.34
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
- Contact:
True - but the FT in the tweet above is folded in half and still orientated so as to obscure the masthead - which rather suggests that the newsagent doesn't think masthead visibility affects sales.Philip wrote: Tue 16 Jan, 2018 15.42But as the paper was larger it would have been folded on its side.sqwidge1978 wrote: Tue 16 Jan, 2018 15.25 Wouldn't the Old Masthead have had a similar issue as that was Justified on the right
tillyoshea wrote: Tue 16 Jan, 2018 17.48 True - but the FT in the tweet above is folded in half and still orientated so as to obscure the masthead - which rather suggests that the newsagent doesn't think masthead visibility affects sales.
The newsagent in that tweet is a fool for putting a paper on his shelf fold-side-underneath.
Also the FT is distinctive due to its pinkness. Perhaps the Guardian should print on paper that's a delightfully neutral shade of taupe, darlings.
I guess it's "period-specific".
Still more modern than this one, which was just taken down only last summer.
https://goo.gl/maps/hFmDcyzau9m
Still more modern than this one, which was just taken down only last summer.
https://goo.gl/maps/hFmDcyzau9m