Posted: Thu 21 Sep, 2006 13.23
Sorry schnuckums! I do think the rule is a bit daft, but Lobster, I provide an irreplaceable bad joke service and expect nothing in return. I must be lowering the bar 

Can you get lower than this?Sput wrote:Sorry schnuckums! I do think the rule is a bit daft, but Lobster, I provide an irreplaceable bad joke service and expect nothing in return. I must be lowering the bar
Fair point. I like Avatars but get fed up looking at myself alongside my posts. I just thought that as everyone knows what i look like it would do no harm for a short while. I've got to get round to doing a new one you see. So i take it i can't have another fairy avatar? It's a nice one it's not offensive or anything.tvmercia wrote:i would like to go on the record to say i am dismayed to see miss hellfire using the following avatar
in clear breach of the rules.
i know gavin is perfect, so he mustn't have noticed it or something. unlike the other place, i like to think the 'pol is free from favouritism and stuff.the rules wrote:Many forum based sites feature avatars - small pictures that accompany posts. Here at Metropol 24))7 we offer users the option to upload only photos of themselves as their avatar. We believe it creates a more personal touch to your posts and helps to differentiate people. You are of course free to upload any non photo related images to your signature.
Can you try and merge all 3? That could look cool.bee bee see wrote:Yeah, I tried that, and someone said I looked too smug, so I removed it! And other photos are more embarrassing. One makes me look camp, one makes me look like I'm trying to look hard, and anything else makes me look fat.the rules wrote:Many forum based sites feature avatars - small pictures that accompany posts. Here at Metropol 24))7 we offer users the option to upload only photos of themselves as their avatar. We believe it creates a more personal touch to your posts and helps to differentiate people. You are of course free to upload any non photo related images to your signature.
Depends how much he's asking.. * sniff*Sput wrote:Are you trying to imply that your online persona is a thin white line? Because I think that's overselling it just a bit, cdd!
A camp, hard, fat teenager? That would be anything but cool.miss hellfire wrote:Can you try and merge all 3? That could look cool.bee bee see wrote:Yeah, I tried that, and someone said I looked too smug, so I removed it! And other photos are more embarrassing. One makes me look camp, one makes me look like I'm trying to look hard, and anything else makes me look fat.the rules wrote:Many forum based sites feature avatars - small pictures that accompany posts. Here at Metropol 24))7 we offer users the option to upload only photos of themselves as their avatar. We believe it creates a more personal touch to your posts and helps to differentiate people. You are of course free to upload any non photo related images to your signature.
Why now get dressed up in a fairy costume - that way you can have the fairy and it will stay within the rules as its a pic of you.miss hellfire wrote:So i take it i can't have another fairy avatar? It's a nice one it's not offensive or anything.
I'm afraid not. The point of avatars is so that people can see the person "speaking".miss hellfire wrote:Fair point. I like Avatars but get fed up looking at myself alongside my posts. I just thought that as everyone knows what i look like it would do no harm for a short while. I've got to get round to doing a new one you see. So i take it i can't have another fairy avatar? It's a nice one it's not offensive or anything.
Could we not have a gallery instead, and then we can have whatever avatar we want.