Stuart* wrote:I can forgive you correcting Lorns' messages as having bad quote tags; even perhaps correcting some of Gav's original messages to me, but sneaking about doing edits to quotes on other posts isn't really fair is it?
My edit was when I changed "and and all" to "any and all" (what I meant to say) from my own post and your subsequent quote.
You might also note - not that I am required to explain myself - that I closed your report about being called a cunt - because you were behaving like one. A cunt is as a cunt does, as granny used to say.
While I understand you may have mistaken the mode of sputs original post regarding his teacher, it was made clear enough in his follow up post that he was offended by your implication. The right thing to do at that point would have been to back down - possibly even apologise for your error. Instead you argued the point and told him he had no right to have a "moral high ground".
It all reads perfectly clearly to me - after a good night's sleep.
Anyway - enough.
Stu - if you feel the need to RTP a post, then go ahead; but a judgement will be made by Ison (not "Jimmy") or myself regarding the validity of that report based on what has been said in the thread.
Edits to posts do not require your approval or consent - and if you feel unable to deal with basic forum housekeeping tasks without accusing all and sundry of "sneaking around", then you should consider your membership carefully.
Lets have a better day, shall we?
I suspect it's no more realistic than the Daily Mail stats we so often ridicule!
