Ison: now with mod goodness!
I'm underwhelmed. If you were going to make an impromptu statement I expected better than that.James H wrote:CUNT ALERT - YOU ARE A GRADE A CUNT
Fail at GCSE 'Metropol Communications' Tsk!

Is it *fact*, or just one of your random thoughts?Nick Harvey wrote:Yes, James, you've summed up nicely what by far the majority of us are thinking.
User removed
It's ok, I'll give him a John Lewis gift voucher.nodnirG kraM wrote:All I have left for you is seven pounds Sterling. Which by the morning will be worth less than that Curly Wurly after Mr H has consumed it.
And who said I was trying to impress you Cuntstead? I was merely telling you what you are. Less an impromptu statement and more a considered judgement.
Sorry, I was so preoccupied with calling Stu a cunt that I nearly made the whole post about him.Nini wrote:Who's this "he" chappie and what value is this voucher?James H wrote:It's ok, I'll give him a John Lewis gift voucher.
Of course what I meant to say was "her" and it will be £10, with love from me to you.
Bloody hell Plymouth, really, what's your payoff here? >_>
EDIT: The post I was referring to be deleted. Of course...
EDIT: The post I was referring to be deleted. Of course...
Mmm, I noticed the post had been deleted after I tried to reply to it.
He wrote something about evidence for me calling him a cunt, and what I said being a "profound statement".
"Or do you have nothing to say, as per usual." - or something like that.
The last sentence he seemed not to know what I was talking about. How banal and twattish he really is.
He wrote something about evidence for me calling him a cunt, and what I said being a "profound statement".
"Or do you have nothing to say, as per usual." - or something like that.
The last sentence he seemed not to know what I was talking about. How banal and twattish he really is.
Gosh, what an amazing display of human ignorance we've developed in here.
For all of James H's bad language - I think he pretty much sums up what the whole "argument" has been about. I need not say any more because Stuart* has not addressed any of the key points, instead choosing to wail that he's being insulted for stating his glorious facts.
But, the most important point is this:
WHY IS MY GLORIOUS THREAD BEING INVADED BY CRETINOUS BEHAVIOUR?
For all of James H's bad language - I think he pretty much sums up what the whole "argument" has been about. I need not say any more because Stuart* has not addressed any of the key points, instead choosing to wail that he's being insulted for stating his glorious facts.
But, the most important point is this:
WHY IS MY GLORIOUS THREAD BEING INVADED BY CRETINOUS BEHAVIOUR?
Good Lord!