The forum discussing radio
-
Sput
- Posts: 7547
- Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57
What did Brand do wrong, exactly? For that matter, what did Ross do wrong? All he did was state the truth.
Knight knight
-
Jovis
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Fri 25 Aug, 2006 20.08
Stuart, did you hear it in context? On the show? Don't say that is irrelevant, as it is not.
-
Stuart*
- Banned
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 10.31
- Location: Devon
Jovis wrote:Stuart, did you hear it in context? On the show? Don't say that is irrelevant, as it is not.
I have listened to the whole show, yes. I still view my comments as relevant and applicable.
I don't need to be a Daily Mail ranter to be able to voice my opinion here or anywhere else.
User removed
-
Stuart*
- Banned
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 10.31
- Location: Devon
Sput wrote:Answer my question too.
Sput wrote:What did Brand do wrong, exactly? For that matter, what did Ross do wrong? All he did was state the truth.
Both breached the Telecommunications Act.
User removed
-
James H
- Posts: 1276
- Joined: Tue 20 Jul, 2004 14.49
- Location: In your endo
Alas, if only you had quoted the correct Act! Then your pithy comeback would have meant something.
Alas, as you didn't, then it means fuck all.
I think you were looking for
this.
-
Stuart*
- Banned
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 10.31
- Location: Devon
James H wrote:Alas, as you didn't, then it means fuck all.
I think you were looking for
this.
Check before you you try to be clever, James. Your link leads to the 1984 Act, mine to the 2003
Act.
Mmm...does one replace the other?
User removed
-
James H
- Posts: 1276
- Joined: Tue 20 Jul, 2004 14.49
- Location: In your endo
No, the 2003 one refers to the 1984 one for the stipulations of the TELEcommunications act.
