TV Forum Watch News and Information Board

Locked
Stuart*
Banned
Posts: 2150
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 10.31
Location: Devon

Sput wrote:I see, I see. It's only childish when *I* criticise.
Yes, in the way you decided to label my posts with your own definition of psycho-analytical terms. It's not contributing to the thread, it's needlessly disrupting it.

I'll look at any questions you have unanswered in another thread, but in the meantime - don't make this board-wide; it's not pleasant for everyone else, so please keep it confined to one place!
User removed
Top
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 7629
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.36
Location: Dundee

StuartPlymouth wrote:
Sput wrote:I see, I see. It's only childish when *I* criticise.
Yes, in the way you decided to label my posts with your own definition of psycho-analytical terms. It's not contributing to the thread, it's needlessly disrupting it.
my god stuart will you SHUT UP. You're the one who took the thread off topic in the first place with your baseless accusation. You've them droned on and on all evening about how dreadful sput is when, if nothing else, he isn't a complete bore like yourself.

This ends NOW.
"He has to be larger than bacon"
Top
User avatar
Ebeneezer Scrooge
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue 23 Sep, 2003 13.53
Location: Scrooge Towers

Connor Sephton wrote:
Sput wrote:#1. Patronising, derogatory.

Until you answer my questions in the other thread, stu, I'm going to label every passive-aggressive insult you make.
Stay tuned to us here on Metropol as Sput's niceness week is in continuum.
Last week, Sput gave notice that his niceness week had been rescinded in the case of Stuart.
Snarky
Top
Connor Sephton
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri 04 Jan, 2008 15.40

Oh my.

This is the bit where Sput logs in cursing every user in sight with profanities, a deep, deep contrast to his week of pleasantness. :lol:.
The Rt. Hon. Connor Sephton, also known as Connews on the TVF.
Top
Stuart*
Banned
Posts: 2150
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 10.31
Location: Devon

Connor Sephton wrote:Oh my!
No. He extended his period of self-proclaimed (and self-promoting) "niceness week" for a further period (except for myself and Mr Grindon, apparently, although why he's added him I have no idea).

Arrogance personified!
User removed
Top
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

StuartPlymouth wrote:
Connor Sephton wrote:Oh my!
No. He extended his period of self-proclaimed (and self-promoting) "niceness week" for a further period (except for myself and Mr Grindon, apparently, although why he's added him I have no idea).

Arrogance personified!
Yup, I'm basically a french Hitler at this stage.
Knight knight
Top
User avatar
Mr Q
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue 05 Sep, 2006 11.31
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:
Contact Mr Q

Sput wrote:
StuartPlymouth wrote:
Connor Sephton wrote:Oh my!
No. He extended his period of self-proclaimed (and self-promoting) "niceness week" for a further period (except for myself and Mr Grindon, apparently, although why he's added him I have no idea).

Arrogance personified!
Yup, I'm basically a french Hitler at this stage.
In the immortal words of Basil Fawlty, "This is exactly how Nazi Germany started. A lot of layabouts with nothing better to do than to cause trouble."
Image
Top
Alexia
Posts: 3001
Joined: Sat 01 Oct, 2005 17.50

I'm sure a moderator should at least know his SPAG (spelling, punctuation and grammar) rules.

I am shocked that Bail, being the super-duper student he is (See his Media Tabloidism mock) uses "bare in mind" and "library's" in his reply to Barcode's Music Library request post in Media Websites.

I don't mind the od speling misstake, but those are just lazy.
Top
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

Alexia wrote:I'm sure a moderator should at least know his SPAG (spelling, punctuation and grammar) rules.
And I'm sure that most people know there's no point putting an acronym if you're going to explain what it stands for and not use it again :)
Knight knight
Top
User avatar
Bail
Posts: 1142
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 21.41
Location: UK

What exactly is wrong with "bare in mind" ?
Image
Top
User avatar
Gavin Scott
Admin
Posts: 6442
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:
Contact Gavin Scott

Bail wrote:What exactly is wrong with "bare in mind" ?
It should be bear (as in, "to carry") in mind.
Top
Locked

Return to “The Lounge”