TV Forum Watch News and Information Board

Jovis
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri 25 Aug, 2006 20.08

Oooh, you're going to be in so much trouble. Thank you.

Why is a news programme moving to an identical studio with an identical set causing such fascination? I know that those who post in the Newsroom are generally geeks but I still find it very strange.
Square Eyes
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.38

Blink and you missed it.

A moderator was on the case quickly. Have you had a censure Mr Harvey ?
barcode
Posts: 1515
Joined: Wed 29 Aug, 2007 19.36

its gone!
Jovis
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri 25 Aug, 2006 20.08

Am I seeing things?

He could have at least just closed it, as a sort of medal. What a strange metaphor.
User avatar
Nick Harvey
God
Posts: 4160
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 22.26
Location: Deepest Wiltshire
Contact:

Moderating Team wrote:This is an automatic private message informing you that you have been warned as a result of your post in The TV Forum obituary thread.

Any further abuse of this website will result in an instant banning from that particular forum for one week.

This has been sent from an unread account.
Haven't a clue why I've been warned about that particular post though.

And, of course, there's no way of asking the unread account, as usual.
User avatar
Bail
Posts: 1142
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 21.41
Location: UK

Nick Harvey wrote:
Moderating Team wrote:This is an automatic private message informing you that you have been warned as a result of your post in The TV Forum obituary thread.

Any further abuse of this website will result in an instant banning from that particular forum for one week.

This has been sent from an unread account.
Haven't a clue why I've been warned about that particular post though.

And, of course, there's no way of asking the unread account, as usual.
Probably because it was totally pointless and just trying to prove a point? I can't stop people making a thread when someone dies. We've had 2 go off topic this week (Todays and Beadle) so to try and stop that I suggest making a specific thread, which fair enough you don't like, but as many say posting obit threads at all is pointless, but if they are band outright then someone complains when someone important does die but cant post it. Its a loose loose.
Image
Jovis
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri 25 Aug, 2006 20.08

I still don't see why that post was the offensive one though?

Surely the new thread was 'bad'.
User avatar
Bail
Posts: 1142
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 21.41
Location: UK

Jovis wrote:I still don't see why that post was the offensive one though?

Surely the new thread was 'bad'.
It was, but as its not there you can't link to it.
Image
User avatar
Nick Harvey
God
Posts: 4160
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 22.26
Location: Deepest Wiltshire
Contact:

Bail wrote:Probably because it was totally pointless and just trying to prove a point?
I think you've blown yourself out of the water with that particular bit of logic.
Bail wrote:if they are band outright then someone complains
The Brighouse and Rastrick, perchance?
Bail wrote:a loose loose.
Don't worry, I can tighten it up if you like.
User avatar
Bail
Posts: 1142
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 21.41
Location: UK

Yes.. well.. my logic makes sense to me... You get my jist though.
Image
User avatar
Nick Harvey
God
Posts: 4160
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 22.26
Location: Deepest Wiltshire
Contact:

Bail wrote:You get my jist though.
No, quite seriously, I'm afraid I don't.

If I did, I might not still be arguing the point.
Locked