The 2003 Picture Gallery

Should I re-publish the 2003 gallery?

Aye
36
86%
Nay
6
14%
 
Total votes: 42
User avatar
lukey
Posts: 587
Joined: Thu 25 May, 2006 01.11
Location: London
Contact:

Christ. I forgot I was even on that. Just.....christ.
Alarsne53
Posts: 199
Joined: Fri 13 Jan, 2006 22.41
Location: Surrey

Neil Green wrote:Gulp.

That's a fucking dreadful picture of me :(
If its any consolation I didn't think it actually was you.
Image
cdd
Posts: 2633
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 14.05

noelfirl wrote:Awww... there's that picture of cdd again, the one that just drives the urge to punch somebody nearby who's posh looking.
Please try William Hanson next door. ;)
Jamez
Banned
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sun 30 May, 2004 23.02
Location: Bristol

Fucking hell.

Where did you get that picture of me?! I look SOOO young!
User Removed
User avatar
Finn
Posts: 614
Joined: Sun 06 Nov, 2005 17.02
Location: Manchester

Alarsne53 wrote:
Neil Green wrote:Gulp.

That's a fucking dreadful picture of me :(
If its any consolation I didn't think it actually was you.
It wasn't...

*crosses fingers*
Ant
Posts: 630
Joined: Sat 15 May, 2004 13.48
Location: Edinburgh

Aw superb.

Everyone looks so beautiful.
User avatar
Finn
Posts: 614
Joined: Sun 06 Nov, 2005 17.02
Location: Manchester

Ant wrote:Aw superb.

Everyone looks so beautiful.
Clearly, you should have gone to Specsavers.
User avatar
Nick Harvey
God
Posts: 4162
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 22.26
Location: Deepest Wiltshire
Contact:

As has happened every single time the gallery has been published in the past, I'm now getting all the PMs from the people who regret putting their pictures into the public domain in the first place, but who are now blaming me for their publication.

I shall, therefore, have to do the same as has always happened in the past and remove all the pictures from view sometime on Saturday, in order to keep the peace.

Far be it from me to suggest that anyone here would so much as consider making a copy of the page before it's withdrawn, but certain people would get quite cross with me if I didn't suggest that that was not an awfully good idea.
User avatar
lukey
Posts: 587
Joined: Thu 25 May, 2006 01.11
Location: London
Contact:

Nick Harvey wrote:As has happened every single time the gallery has been published in the past, I'm now getting all the PMs from the people who regret putting their pictures into the public domain in the first place, but who are now blaming me for their publication.

I shall, therefore, have to do the same as has always happened in the past and remove all the pictures from view sometime on Saturday, in order to keep the peace.

Far be it from me to suggest that anyone here would so much as consider making a copy of the page before it's withdrawn, but certain people would get quite cross with me if I didn't suggest that that was not an awfully good idea.
I'm not the least bit shocked, but I guess that's their right to be like that, Not that I'd want to suggest I saved a copy of the site and images immediately after you published it for that reason.
cdd
Posts: 2633
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 14.05

Also, I've just noticed:

"cdd: - Chris Denman"

Did I have a colon after my name at some point, then? Or was that just a typo?

I vaguely remember it from years ago but not clearly enough to be sure. Too bad so sad.
User avatar
Nick Harvey
God
Posts: 4162
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 22.26
Location: Deepest Wiltshire
Contact:

cdd wrote:Did I have a colon after my name at some point, then? Or was that just a typo?
It's extremely likely that you did.

I daren't say that I never do typos, but it's pretty darned unusual.
Please Respond