WHY the on earth are you lot suggesting I become a mod?
this is the biggest piss take in years? or trying ( and very well indeed) to stir up shit?
Moderator
Actually it's quite a mixture of high and lowbrow stuff. Most people here are quite intelligent, they just have good ways of hiding it.barcode wrote:Please this place was already at its lowest common denominator before I even joined,
There are no absolutes in science, but I'm certain that's a "no". That's the ignorance people are talking about right there.Barcode wrote:just like 30 years ago the got it wrong it could happen again.
*Best post I've seen in ages*Barcode wrote: maybe it you clooks??? that does not make since!
oh, and NO ONE is suggesting you be a mod apart from Jovis, and that's only for entertainment value.
Knight knight
-
Square Eyes
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.38
Yes but since when has tiresome, ignorant, pompous, annoying and troll like precluded anyone from participating in this community ? Barcode is no less accomplished at it than any of the other members, but he does it with errors, and so it becomes more obvious.Hymagumba wrote:
I, personally, do not find his spelling to be the annoying point. I simply find him tiresome, ignorant, and generally annoying and troll like. Even when he is able to spell I find his attitude so boring and his dismissal of those who do not adore him pompous.
COUGH First post of this thread - the person who started this whole thing of
Jamez wrote:There are only 2 moderators on this forum, Johnnyboy and Re-it-er-ate who have both sadly died.
I think we should have an election. I nominate Barcode to be a new moderator.
Yes but Jamez is a shitstirrer, ignore anything he posts.
I've spent many a year helping younger brothers with homework and two years working with a dyslexic manager so I can happily read the majority of his posts in two attempts at the most. I'm not so cretinous as to discriminate on those grounds. It would be easier if he was to be more careful with his spelling (which I believe is currently causing him trouble because his firefox upgraded and he didn't update the dictionary with it).
Having sat here and thought about it whilst retyping this three times to due new replies from Sput and SE being highlighted, I suspect it is his stubbornness that annoys me. If there is one type of person I cannot stand it is those who cannot accept when they are incorrect and then behave like a complete tosspot when proven wrong. Bulldozer people I call them and StuPlymouth is a very mild form of one.
Rob Del Monte and his punctuations was a particularly bad one and barcode is on that level. That is the route of my dislike.
Perhaps if he would
1 - learn to debate politely
2 - learn to shut up when proven wrong by sput
3 - sort his spelling to stop drawing attention to his posts and the issues within them
Then I wouldn't mind him so much. Although by now I suspect he's annoyed a chunk of the membership so much it would be hard to do so without a rebranding and soft relaunch.
And Stu, I'm sober and have not had a drink in days, I'm perfectly aware of what I am typing and am not one to go about retracting posts just because you do not approve.
I've spent many a year helping younger brothers with homework and two years working with a dyslexic manager so I can happily read the majority of his posts in two attempts at the most. I'm not so cretinous as to discriminate on those grounds. It would be easier if he was to be more careful with his spelling (which I believe is currently causing him trouble because his firefox upgraded and he didn't update the dictionary with it).
Having sat here and thought about it whilst retyping this three times to due new replies from Sput and SE being highlighted, I suspect it is his stubbornness that annoys me. If there is one type of person I cannot stand it is those who cannot accept when they are incorrect and then behave like a complete tosspot when proven wrong. Bulldozer people I call them and StuPlymouth is a very mild form of one.
Rob Del Monte and his punctuations was a particularly bad one and barcode is on that level. That is the route of my dislike.
Perhaps if he would
1 - learn to debate politely
2 - learn to shut up when proven wrong by sput
3 - sort his spelling to stop drawing attention to his posts and the issues within them
Then I wouldn't mind him so much. Although by now I suspect he's annoyed a chunk of the membership so much it would be hard to do so without a rebranding and soft relaunch.
And Stu, I'm sober and have not had a drink in days, I'm perfectly aware of what I am typing and am not one to go about retracting posts just because you do not approve.
"He has to be larger than bacon"
you do know that, I'm now out of the school system, but while in the school I never had to write ONE exam!
Spell in a EXAM
read by my self in the EXAM ( I read it while someone else read it outloud)
all I had to do was Talk!
this includes the English exam! which their read it to me!
strange thing is I have no trouble with sput
Spell in a EXAM
read by my self in the EXAM ( I read it while someone else read it outloud)
all I had to do was Talk!
this includes the English exam! which their read it to me!
strange thing is I have no trouble with sput
really? I must say surely that would be more counter productive than helpful. You're in your 30s are you not? Did they make you write in normal classes?barcode wrote:you do know that, I'm now out of the school system, but while in the school I never had to write ONE exam!
Spell in a EXAM
read by my self in the EXAM ( I read it while someone else read it outloud)
all I had to do was Talk!
this includes the English exam! which their read it to me!
strange thing is I have no trouble with sput
although I notice once again we're back to spelling and you ignored the rest of my post.
"He has to be larger than bacon"
30's? I'm not as old as you: early ealry 20's
yes there put my in normal classes: put once again some one was there writing for me:
""although I notice once again we're back to spelling and you ignored the rest of my post.""
one thing at a time:
with 2 - learn to shut up when proven wrong by sput I have leaned to deal with him, and doesn;t make since, I though were suppose to debate ( that will be covered more with no1 )
and on top of that I though this place was a bitch feast?
yes there put my in normal classes: put once again some one was there writing for me:
""although I notice once again we're back to spelling and you ignored the rest of my post.""
one thing at a time:
with 2 - learn to shut up when proven wrong by sput I have leaned to deal with him, and doesn;t make since, I though were suppose to debate ( that will be covered more with no1 )
and on top of that I though this place was a bitch feast?
I think I need to have words with this researcher after encountering Barcode.Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
StuartPlymouth: I think you like Barcode more out of principle than practice
that made since to me!Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
