Slags on Sky

[Jamez]

Last night I was having a bit of trouble getting to sleep. The rain was lashing against my velux windows and it was hot and stuffy in my room.

I flicked on the TV and switched on Sky. I flicked through the radio channels but there was nothing of interest. I flicked backwards until I stumbled across some quite shocking stuff.

Channels 900 - 920 seemed to be full of women lying on beds, talking into a phone and rubbing their private parts through their tiny thongs. The studio audio was cut and replaced with a dull, looped dance track.

The text on the screen had a large 0908 number emblazoned across it and invited me to txt in a picture of my penis for £3.00! I nearly considered it until I realised I would be the one paying THEM £3.00 per picture!!

The other channels were more-or-less the same. One or two of them had several hideously ugly topless women vigorously shaking their sweaty arses into the camera lens.

Not one of the women I saw on those channels were attractive in the slightest. A couple of them had nice enough bodies I suppose, but their haggard and scrawny slut faces was the biggest turn off.

I was also surprised by how graphic some of the stuff was.

Then one girl appeared on one of the channels. For a start she looked like a clown. A mass of electric blue eyeshadow, bright red lipstick adorned her minging face. Then she grabbed a microphone and proceeded to speak directly to her mostly masturbating audience...

And Oh My God. She has the funniest and most ridiculous speech impediment I've ever heard. She sounded like she had no tongue or teeth. I was weak with laughter.

She called herself 'Twinkle'. Her chosen performing name is ridiculous in itself.

Anyway, my point is should this kind of stuff be available free-to-air on Sky? The fun begins as early as 9pm with the ugliest, silicone-injected slags you can imagine masturbating furiously for the gratification of perverted men.

These channels are disgustingly tacky. They're simply televised versions of sex chat lines.

They give men a bad name and they exploit women. I'm not a prude, but I really don't think we need this kind of trash television.

Most of the women on these channels are probably either prostitutes, crack-addicts or penniless single mothers from squalid London council estates.

What do you think? Have you seen these channels on Sky? Do you think that free-to-air televised sex lines are acceptable?

[Ant]

Playboy One is alright.

[Stuart*]

The text on the screen had a large 0908 number emblazoned across it and invited me to txt in a picture of my penis for £3.00! I nearly considered it until I realised I would be the one paying THEM £3.00 per picture!!

Avoid the £3.00 charge, simply send said picture to me for the usual network charge (I will PM my mobile number)!

[Gavin Scott]

Why do they "give men a bad name"? To whom? Not other men, surely?

I don't have much comment on the fact that the women are pugly, but I would observe that men on this type of thing are usually very attractive - face and body.

[Jamez]

Why do they "give men a bad name"? To whom? Not other men, surely?

I refer to a comment Mrs Jamez made while watching this trash with me. She said that these channels give men a bad name in general. Assuming that all men are sex-mad and perverted. She quite rightly said that the women on screen aren't women - 'more of a subspecies of the female gender'. Hilarious.

To balance it out, should there be channels with straight men lying around on beds asking women to phone them up? I'm sure there must be a market for it.

[Stuart*]

...but I would observe that men on this type of thing are usually very attractive - face and body.

What a terrible letch you are Mr Scott!

PS:
To Jamez: I guess that's a "no" for the pic then!

[Katnap]

To balance it out, should there be channels with straight men lying around on beds asking women to phone them up?

Nah. Who needs that when you have a vibrator and imagination?

[Lorns]

To balance it out, should there be channels with straight men lying around on beds asking women to phone them up?

Nah. Who needs that when you have a vibrator and imagination?

Just what i was thinking. Who needs a man when we have Ann Summers. The rabbit will never let a girl down

[Lorns]

Last night I was having a bit of trouble getting to sleep. The rain was lashing against my velux windows and it was hot and stuffy in my room.

I flicked on the TV and switched on Sky. I flicked through the radio channels but there was nothing of interest. I flicked backwards until I stumbled across some quite shocking stuff.

Channels 900 - 920 seemed to be full of women lying on beds, talking into a phone and rubbing their private parts through their tiny thongs. The studio audio was cut and replaced with a dull, looped dance track.

The text on the screen had a large 0908 number emblazoned across it and invited me to txt in a picture of my penis for £3.00! I nearly considered it until I realised I would be the one paying THEM £3.00 per picture!!

The other channels were more-or-less the same. One or two of them had several hideously ugly topless women vigorously shaking their sweaty arses into the camera lens.

Not one of the women I saw on those channels were attractive in the slightest. A couple of them had nice enough bodies I suppose, but their haggard and scrawny slut faces was the biggest turn off.

I was also surprised by how graphic some of the stuff was.

Then one girl appeared on one of the channels. For a start she looked like a clown. A mass of electric blue eyeshadow, bright red lipstick adorned her minging face. Then she grabbed a microphone and proceeded to speak directly to her mostly masturbating audience...

And Oh My God. She has the funniest and most ridiculous speech impediment I've ever heard. She sounded like she had no tongue or teeth. I was weak with laughter.

She called herself 'Twinkle'. Her chosen performing name is ridiculous in itself.

Anyway, my point is should this kind of stuff be available free-to-air on Sky? The fun begins as early as 9pm with the ugliest, silicone-injected slags you can imagine masturbating furiously for the gratification of perverted men.

These channels are disgustingly tacky. They're simply televised versions of sex chat lines.

They give men a bad name and they exploit women. I'm not a prude, but I really don't think we need this kind of trash television.

Most of the women on these channels are probably either prostitutes, crack-addicts or penniless single mothers from squalid London council estates.

What do you think? Have you seen these channels on Sky? Do you think that free-to-air televised sex lines are acceptable?

Is that really you Jamez or has your account been hijacked?

I can't believe i'm hearing you moan about such material.

[Gavin Scott]

Why do they "give men a bad name"? To whom? Not other men, surely?

I refer to a comment Mrs Jamez made while watching this trash with me. She said that these channels give men a bad name in general.

Oh I see. Well she is correct only in so far as 16 year old girls who get knocked up to get a council flat give women a bad name. I'm not sure there's anything "in general" about it.

That said I like a bit of porno. I'm a red blooded man and there's nothing wrong with it. However, I've always found the idea of paying someone to strip or fiddle with themselves for cash to be a different kettle of fish. Colleagues at work have been known to end up in strip clubs, but I find that idea mortifying.

[nwtv2003]

It's not only on Sky, take a look at Freeview Ch 37, Smile TV which broadcasts after 1.00am and it does exactly what Jamez has said.

If sad old men want porn, why not go on the net? It's such a waste of time and money for Porn on British TV.