Why has this thread been renamed?!
Er, no, that's not an interrobang. That's a symbol to indicate the font you're using does not have a symbol for an interrobang.Jenny wrote:Looks like a perfectly ordinary, common or garden interrobang to me. What's the problem‽Gavin Scott wrote: ‽
What the heck is that, and why do you do it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrobang
- Gavin Scott
- Admin
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Well that would go a long way to explaining my confusion.marksi wrote:Er, no, that's not an interrobang. That's a symbol to indicate the font you're using does not have a symbol for an interrobang.Jenny wrote:Looks like a perfectly ordinary, common or garden interrobang to me. What's the problem‽Gavin Scott wrote: ‽
What the heck is that, and why do you do it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrobang
So can others see a square?
- Gavin Scott
- Admin
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
I see. Or rather, I don't. Not on either of my machines.marksi wrote:At home I can see a square, here in work I can see a squiggly thing that makes less sense than a square.
In any event, given that it is a, "rarely used, nonstandard English-language punctuation mark", it's probably best that it isn't used here.
Not that I need to explain my decision, naturally.