*Banality*

stu
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 19.34
Location: Kings Oak

James Hatts wrote:I'm always suspicious of people who write 'Bbc' or 'Itv' in thread titles.

You get a lot of that sort of riff-raff over at Digital Spy.
Any forum that isn't a pres forum will write Itv or Bbc

Usually followed by "I only watch Itv for football, the rest is rubbish" or how much they like their US imports
Andrew
Posts: 337
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 18.18

stu wrote:
James Hatts wrote:I'm always suspicious of people who write 'Bbc' or 'Itv' in thread titles.

You get a lot of that sort of riff-raff over at Digital Spy.
Any forum that isn't a pres forum will write Itv or Bbc

Usually followed by "I only watch Itv for football, the rest is rubbish" or how much they like their US imports
Most non-pres forums, seem to go with the 'channel 1, channel 3',etc and of course 'sky' for anything non-terrestrial
Anonymous

Jamez wrote:Oh god!

Itsrobot seems to be having a cybersex relationship with BBC News presenters, now.

Can this boy get any geekier?
I'm not sure - he could always have a "cybersex relationship" with a dried up old hag with a crap haircut who's on her 4th husband. Now that would be "geeky", wouldn't it?
noelfirl
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 18.45
Location: London

http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopi ... 32&start=0

Is anybody else slightly concerned that this ridiculous self appointed "mock council of the nobodies" is being allowed to continue unabated and approved by the mods (in the form of thread stickyness) when it is blatently obvious that it completely unnecessary and incredibly patronising to have such a system in place.

All the mock forum needs to improve is to have some good mocks and effective written opinions, without unnecessary ratings, stars, or cliched "criteria" points to write in context of.
Image
Chris
Posts: 845
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 19.03
Location: Surrey

noelfirl wrote:http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopi ... 32&start=0

Is anybody else slightly concerned that this ridiculous self appointed "mock council of the nobodies" is being allowed to continue unabated and approved by the mods (in the form of thread stickyness) when it is blatently obvious that it completely unnecessary and incredibly patronising to have such a system in place.

All the mock forum needs to improve is to have some good mocks and effective written opinions, without unnecessary ratings, stars, or cliched "criteria" points to write in context of.
I think all this formulaic crap is a bit too, well, school like. Plus, with the star bits as well. If I want to make comments, then I will be honest, and stick to no guidelines.

I wll say what comes to mind based on what I see in front of me - if it's shit then I will say so without the aid of stars.
User avatar
Nick Harvey
God
Posts: 4160
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 22.26
Location: Deepest Wiltshire
Contact:

Isn't the whole damn place far too "school-like" ever since Mental Charlie took over?

It's not just the mock area, it's the rest of the sections as well.
wells
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun 31 Jul, 2005 14.52

[quote="Nick Harvey"]Isn't the whole damn place far too "school-like" ever since Mental Charlie took over?

I belive that Chalie is the best MOD on TVF.
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 7628
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.36
Location: Dundee

yes but you have an ugly face
"He has to be larger than bacon"
James H
Posts: 1276
Joined: Tue 20 Jul, 2004 14.49
Location: In your endo

Hymagumba wrote:yes but you have an ugly face
he reminds me of will young.

I hate will young.
wells
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun 31 Jul, 2005 14.52

Hymagumba wrote:yes but you have an ugly face
Indeed in that photo but thats why I choosed it!
wells
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun 31 Jul, 2005 14.52

James H wrote:
Hymagumba wrote:yes but you have an ugly face
he reminds me of will young.

I hate will young.
How does Hymagumba look like Will Young? He looks like he should be in McFly!
Please Respond