The London Underground Thread

User avatar
DVB Cornwall
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 21.42

The New Look Rolling Stock ordered from Bombardier

Subsurface lines
Image
Image

Deep Lines
Image
Image
User avatar
nidave
Posts: 697
Joined: Wed 19 May, 2004 14.39
Location: Manchester

Why is there a diffrence between the sub surface lines and the deep lines - is there some technical diffrence why the trains are diffrent?
User avatar
DVB Cornwall
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 21.42

fears being accused of being an anorak but ....

Sub surface lines (Circle District, Hammersmith & City) have wider tunnels and therefore slightly larger trains can be accomodated. One interesting fact (anorak alert) is that the new rolling stock will enable passengers to walk the entire length of the train and not be stuck in the same carriage for their journey. Hopefully this will lead to better seat occupancy. It'll also lead to more standing room too.
User avatar
iSon
Moderator
Posts: 1634
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 23.24
Location: London

DVB Cornwall wrote:fears being accused of being an anorak but ....

Sub surface lines (Circle District, Hammersmith & City) have wider tunnels and therefore slightly larger trains can be accomodated. One interesting fact (anorak alert) is that the new rolling stock will enable passengers to walk the entire length of the train and not be stuck in the same carriage for their journey. Hopefully this will lead to better seat occupancy. It'll also lead to more standing room too.
Sort of - but the main difference is actually that deep level tube lines (Bakerloo, Central, Jubilee, Northern, Piccadilly, Victoria, Waterloo & City lines) are in tunnels that were mined deep below the ground. Sub surface lines (Circle, District, East London, Hammersmith & City and Metropolitan lines) are lines that were created through cut and cover methods and are generally in the open air with tunnels and stations being covered that are (largely) above or below street level.

Not a great explanation but makes sense to me! :lol:

Perhaps a better explanation is at http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/company/hist ... -years.asp
Good Lord!
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

Have you been at that encyclopedia again, James?
Knight knight
User avatar
iSon
Moderator
Posts: 1634
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 23.24
Location: London

Sput wrote:Have you been at that encyclopedia again, James?
I've been consulting Chapter 7 of my copybook, and found "London Underground" on my shelf between "Lice" and "Luton".
Good Lord!
User avatar
DVB Cornwall
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 21.42

Good reference material!
Image
Anonymous

Andrew wrote:Do they still have them ones anywhere on the network that had the yellow, brown & black seating? Also, the ones with the hanging balls and the plain silver exterior?
Scrapped in the 1990s. And btw FYI Glasgow has the third oldest subway system in the world. :D
User avatar
BBC LDN
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu 01 Apr, 2004 20.58
Location: Richmond-upon-Thames

SCOTLAND TODAY ADDICT wrote:
Andrew wrote:Do they still have them ones anywhere on the network that had the yellow, brown & black seating? Also, the ones with the hanging balls and the plain silver exterior?
Scrapped in the 1990s.
Erm, they were given new upholstery and are still in service on the District Line... They're gradually being upgraded for one final hooray before being replaced at the end of the decade.
User avatar
Nick Harvey
God
Posts: 4161
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 22.26
Location: Deepest Wiltshire
Contact:

Not wishing to be a party pooper, but is anyone out there on the look out for the, rather obviously, missing "n" from the title of this thread?

Its absence is getting me more and more annoyed.

It's like being back over in Mental Charlie's forum again, with all the children.
Aston
Posts: 278
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 14.28
Location: London

Nick Harvey wrote:Not wishing to be a party pooper, but is anyone out there on the look out for the, rather obviously, missing "n" from the title of this thread?

Its absence is getting me more and more annoyed.

It's like being back over in Mental Charlie's forum again, with all the children.
Whoops!
Please Respond