RegFixUp

Please Respond
J.Christie
Banned
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 19.30

http://www.regfixup.com

Has anyone tried one of these registry fix things before?
Corin
Posts: 132
Joined: Mon 18 Aug, 2003 21.14
Location: Cents, Letzeubuerg

Feynman: "String theorists do not make predictions, they make excuses."
Fireboy
Posts: 294
Joined: Tue 10 Feb, 2004 18.35
Location: Tyneside

Can anyone explain to me exactly why Windows has a registry? It's never really made much sense to me... it doesn't seem to do anything which couldn't be done in a simpler way.
Chris
Posts: 845
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 19.03
Location: Surrey

Fireboy wrote:Can anyone explain to me exactly why Windows has a registry? It's never really made much sense to me... it doesn't seem to do anything which couldn't be done in a simpler way.
Well it's supposed to hold details of all the settings for Windows - I liken it to a big filing cabinet in which one throws all their papers in.

As a Mac user yourself, I'd be interested to know how a Mac does store its settings, and how can a user modify "advanced" settings to improve performance or disable extraneous features?
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

IIRC it's like unix and stores everything in a specific flat file for each app. It makes it a lot easier to edit settings for a specific program without having to worry about affecting others.
Knight knight
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 7631
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.36
Location: Dundee

surely that's what ini files are for. why does the registry exist exactly? seems a waste of time
"He has to be larger than bacon"
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

It's the way windows was built. Yes, ini files COULD have been used, but they decided to go this way. For backing up it's very useful at least.

Plus they'd have a hard time changing at this point as a hell of a lot of apps would have to be rewritten or a great API would have to run. There is, of course, a lot of legacy now.

Hardly rocket science ;)
Knight knight
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 7631
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.36
Location: Dundee

no - i should have asked someone other than you clearly.

talking of legacy. i noticed the add font thing in windows xp is still a windows 3.1 style panel.

there's a shocking amount of legacy code in windows so it's no wonder longhorn is so messed up.

if i were them i'd rewrite xp / vista from scratch to tidy the thing up and get rid of all the crap code before i even considered starting on blackcomb. if netscape 4 had to be scrapped before they could start mozilla the mess an entire operating system must be in after 24 years is frightening.
"He has to be larger than bacon"
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

Hymagumba wrote:no - i should have asked someone other than you clearly.
Why stare at the mantlepiece...?;)

Apparently they got really sick of all the millions of modules cluttering up longhorn and have now rewritten it from scratch. Well not exactly scratch but they're entirely rethinking how it all fits together.
Knight knight
Jamez
Banned
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sun 30 May, 2004 23.02
Location: Bristol

Is it worth me buying a new computer now, or waiting until next year when Longhorn comes out?
Fireboy
Posts: 294
Joined: Tue 10 Feb, 2004 18.35
Location: Tyneside

Jamez wrote:Is it worth me buying a new computer now, or waiting until next year when Longhorn comes out?
It's called Vista (Longhorn was the codeaname). I'd wait... although I am buying a new PC because I need to be able to use MS Access, there's no Mac version, and the 2002 PC is buggered.

Slightly off topic here... but Office 12 (2006/7) has a very OSX-like interface... in fact, more OSX-like than office:mac! (see http://activewin.com/articles/2005/imag ... Shapes.jpg)
Please Respond