Mobile Phones

User avatar
Gavin Scott
Admin
Posts: 6442
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Now I know we've done this before; but I have a shocking memory.

I just got a nice new Nokia 6230.

Image

I love it. I love Nokia's menu system anyway, but this brings me video and picture recording, as well as a nice mp3 player.

I'm betting some of you have top of the line phones, and I would like to know which ones, and what you think of them.

PS: I will likely re-start this thread the next time I upgrade.
Ant
Posts: 630
Joined: Sat 15 May, 2004 13.48
Location: Edinburgh

I've got a nice wee Sagem my-v55. It has photo capturing, voice recording and an MP3 player. No space for songs because of all the voice recordings and hundreds of photos! I'm going to buy a 3G phone soon though...

Image

By the way, that isn't me in the picture. :P
Ant
Posts: 630
Joined: Sat 15 May, 2004 13.48
Location: Edinburgh

Nick Harvey wrote:Image
Might aswell close the thread, we have a winner.
User avatar
Gavin Scott
Admin
Posts: 6442
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Love it, Nick.

We've got one of those (or at least something similar), kicking around head office.

It's been retained for all these years for the amusement value. I'd love to have it on display at home - but I don't have a big enough rucksack to smuggle it out the building!
Chris
Posts: 845
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 19.03
Location: Surrey

This is mine: -

Image

A bit old (OK, compared to Nick's museum piece, it's fairly recent :D ) , but does its job of what I want without fuss - texting and calling. I am not interested in phones laden down with extraneous crap like games, customisable ringtones, mp3 players and cameras which produce webcam-quality images (ick).

Although I very much prefer one of these: -

Image

A desk phone attached to a landline (yes, they do still exist). Much cheaper calls (landline-to-landline) and slightly better sound quality. IMO, nothing beats the good old landline.

I personally think mobiles are a rip-off for calls unless you are on a monthly contract with plenty of free minutes. Of course, this costs quite a few notes.
Chris Turnbull
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun 17 Aug, 2003 02.28
Location: Cylon-occupied Dùn Èideann, Alba, Terra

Image
MOTO RAZR V3, just got it to replace my old one sharp GX10
Image

the RAZR is quite cool, but for some reason, it reminds me of the game HALO. :?
Image
“What the Frack?!?” "SO SAY WE ALL!!!"
Jamez
Banned
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sun 30 May, 2004 23.02
Location: Bristol

DAS
Posts: 925
Joined: Tue 19 Aug, 2003 16.35
Location: The Kingdom of Leather

Image

Pretty chunky, but I love my phone. Great display, nice and swish and allows me to speak to people - EVEN WHEN THEY'RE MILES AWAY!

Only design flaw is the fact the display remains on when you charge it, therefore lighting up the whole room and looking like a Christmas tree.
DJGM
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 15.39
Location: Manchester
Contact:

My recent acquisition . . .

Image Image

The Motorola v220 . . . I'd lost my classic Nokia 3210 ages ago, and I needed a new cellphone for work, so I got
that one. It's got a camera, WAP internet, polyphonic ringtones and stuff, although I didn't particular want one
with a bunch of gratuitous extra features. The one I was really looking to get was this one . . .

Image

The Nokia 3510 . . . a logical and sensible step up from the cellphone I had. Unfortunately, it was sold out in all
the shops I wanted to get it from. Specifically the Orange shops, as I've been with them since December 1999.

This would've been the ideal upgrade, as it's doesn't have too many unnecessary things, aside from a colour
display and WAP internet. I know Orange aren't the cheapest network, but considering I don't actually use
my cellphone a lot, it doesn't really. Because of that, a cellphone contract would be a waste of money.

Anyway, I ended up buying the Motorola v220, for a couple of other reasons . . . my first ever cellphone was
a Motorola m3788, which I've still got. It still works, but only just. The battery only lasts approximately half
of it's original amount of usage time on a full charge nowadays, so I keep it handy as a spare. The other
reasons is that I've always liked the look of those "clamshell" style cellphones.

Image

When I decided to upgrade from that phone, I got a Philips Orange Savvy, so I could just swap the SIM
card over from the old Motorola. I've even still got that, but the original battery is effectively dead now.

I've briefly been with BT Cellnet (back when I worked for them at the Bury Call Centre in 2000) using
a Mitsubishi Trium, a Philips C12 (black version of the Savvy) and that Nokia 3210 that I've since lost!
That same Nokia 3210 has also had brief encounters with One2One/TMobile, and Virgin Mobile.

My only gripe about this Motorola v220 is that even though I've taken a few pictures with the built in
camera, I can't find a way of downloading them on to my computer. I've tried Mobile Phone Tools
software from Motorola, but that only lets me sync the names list on the phone, and enables
the phone to be used as a pseudo dial up internet modem, which is of no use to me.

What's the point of having a camera on a cellphone, if I can't transfer the pics to my computer?!?
And don't say picture messaging, as that's a feature I've very little intention of using . . . if ever!
Chris wrote: I am not interested in phones laden down with extraneous crap like games, custom
ringtones, mp3 players and cameras which produce webcam-quality images . . .
Me neither, to be honest. Whenever I see that stupid little advert for "3", with those stupid little
characters saying, "Watch music videos - on yer mobile!" - "Watch goals - on yer mobile!"
. . . it leaves me thinking only one thing . . . "Why would I want to . . . ?!?"

I don't want to watch goals, because I'm not that interested in football. And if I want to watch
music videos, I'll watch a music video channel on Sky, or download them from the internet!
Ant
Posts: 630
Joined: Sat 15 May, 2004 13.48
Location: Edinburgh

DJGM wrote:The one I was really looking to get was this one . . .

Image

The Nokia 3510 . . . a logical and sensible step up from the cellphone I had. Unfortunately, it was sold out in all
the shops I wanted to get it from. Specifically the Orange shops, as I've been with them since December 1999.

This would've been the ideal upgrade, as it's doesn't have too many unnecessary things, aside from a colour
display and WAP internet. I know Orange aren't the cheapest network, but considering I don't actually use
my cellphone a lot, it doesn't really. Because of that, a cellphone contract would be a waste of money.
I had the 3510i (the colour one) for almost a year and got pretty bored of it. It was just a plain phone with WAP, polyphonic tones and that was about it. I dropped it once and the whole thing went caput - lost phone numbers, texts, ringtones so I sent it down to Newcastle and it took at least a month to "fix". After all that, I just got a replacement. Bloody Nokia.

I'm happy with my MP3 player and camera in one phone to be honest (and by the way, the photos aren't webcam quality - especially when it's set to High Quality, looks exactly like a real digital photo).
Please Respond