I read with enthusiasm on Microsoft's site that they do now have a release date - only a couple of weeks from now - for the first beta release. About time too, I did wonder if Longhorn was ever going to materialise this decade.
What a cacky name however - Vista? What the hell does that mean? That said, it's got to be better than 'XP', which means 'eXPerience', 'eXtended Performance', or nothing at all depending on your source.
Windows Vista set for 2006
- martindtanderson
- Posts: 527
- Joined: Tue 23 Dec, 2003 04.03
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
XP related to "experience", according to Microsoft itself; it wasn't an acronym as such.cwathen wrote:I read with enthusiasm on Microsoft's site that they do now have a release date - only a couple of weeks from now - for the first beta release. About time too, I did wonder if Longhorn was ever going to materialise this decade.
What a cacky name however - Vista? What the hell does that mean? That said, it's got to be better than 'XP', which means 'eXPerience', 'eXtended Performance', or nothing at all depending on your source.
A vista is generally an impressive view, such as that you would see from the top of a mountain, or across a valley, and in usage the term is generally intended to convey a sense of magnificence, of impressive scale, and often of extraordinary beauty.
Don't be ridiculous. You can't patent a word that's in the dictionary. Their product title is "Windows Vista" - not "Windows", not "Vista", but "Microsoft Vista". Think about it, if there was risk of lawsuit then how could there be 6 companies all incorporating the word "Vista" in their company name / produc titles?DJGM wrote:Windows Vista . . . Potential lawsuits aplenty, to keep Microsoft's lawyers busy for a while!
One potential lawsuit.
Another potential lawsuit.
Yet another potential lawsuit.
And another potential lawsuit.
Oh look, another potential lawsuit.
How many other potential lawsuits this may cause, goodness only knows!
Unless of course, Mr Gates and the Redmond Gang, are planning several Vista related buy outs.
I have my own names for it - eXtremely Pricey and eXtreme Poo (well, the search function on Windows XP is anyway).What a cacky name however - Vista? What the hell does that mean? That said, it's got to be better than 'XP', which means 'eXPerience', 'eXtended Performance', or nothing at all depending on your source.
Yes but can they really sue against these companies. I work in the alarm industry & we had a "Vista" alarm panel which was made by Ademco Security & there is currently a CCTV company called Vista that makes CCTV equipment.DJGM wrote:Windows Vista . . . Potential lawsuits aplenty, to keep Microsoft's lawyers busy for a while!
One potential lawsuit.
Another potential lawsuit.
Yet another potential lawsuit.
And another potential lawsuit.
Oh look, another potential lawsuit.
How many other potential lawsuits this may cause, goodness only knows!
Unless of course, Mr Gates and the Redmond Gang, are planning several Vista related buy outs.
I don't personally like Mr Gates' bullyboy tactics
Johnny
Harry Hill : "What is it about people that repair shoes that makes them so good at cutting keys? Try going in there with a shoe shaped like a key and see how confused they get."
Harry Hill : "What is it about people that repair shoes that makes them so good at cutting keys? Try going in there with a shoe shaped like a key and see how confused they get."
I wasn't actually suggesting that Microsoft would attempt to sue those other companies using the word "Vista" in
their product names. I was thinking it'd be more the other way round, with Microsoft being on the recieving end.
It probably goes without saying that Microsoft would win, should any such legal actions take place . . .
their product names. I was thinking it'd be more the other way round, with Microsoft being on the recieving end.
It probably goes without saying that Microsoft would win, should any such legal actions take place . . .
I think that was Johnny's misinterpretation. Microsoft suing those companies would be totally ridiculous.DJGM wrote:I wasn't actually suggesting that Microsoft would attempt to sue those other companies using the word "Vista" in
their product names. I was thinking it'd be more the other way round, with Microsoft being on the recieving end.
It probably goes without saying that Microsoft would win, should any such legal actions take place . . .
As far as other companies suing Micro$oft goes, you can't trademark a word that's in the dictionary. Microsoft's product title is "Windows Vista" - that "Windows" and "Vista" are next to each other is the important thing. If there were a risk of Microsoft receiving a lawsuit then how could there be several companies all incorporating the word "Vista" in their company name / product titles?
Yes apologies I have read that the wrong way round & did think after posting that I had read that wrong
But what name do you guys think will be better than Windows Vista, Microsoft obviously aren't going to go back to numbers
But what name do you guys think will be better than Windows Vista, Microsoft obviously aren't going to go back to numbers
Johnny
Harry Hill : "What is it about people that repair shoes that makes them so good at cutting keys? Try going in there with a shoe shaped like a key and see how confused they get."
Harry Hill : "What is it about people that repair shoes that makes them so good at cutting keys? Try going in there with a shoe shaped like a key and see how confused they get."
...although interestingly the new version of Windows Mobile will be called "Windows Mobile 5" (following on from Windows Mobile 2003 Second Edition).Johnny wrote:Yes apologies I have read that the wrong way round & did think after posting that I had read that wrong
But what name do you guys think will be better than Windows Vista, Microsoft obviously aren't going to go back to numbers
- Andrew Wood
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 23.24
- Location: Location: Location
- Contact: