Looking for a large mobile phone?

Larry Scutta
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue 16 Sep, 2003 00.52

But even that's not right, 3, 7 and 8 are just first digits of local numbers..... sub codes indeed!
dvboy
Posts: 218
Joined: Wed 03 Dec, 2003 01.59
Location: Wolverhampton, West Midlands

That's what you get when journalists don't read a press release properly.
cwathen
Posts: 1334
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 17.28

cdd wrote:
cwathen wrote:
How does it cope with 'Press 1 for this, press 2 for that....' type situations?
Usually, I try to use a different phone for these. But I did pick up a tone generator thingamajig from a car boot sale for £2 - so I can handle these situations when I want to.
You weren't thinking, perchance, of emulating the special operator C5 tones (which are capable of forcing calls through the US, UK (and various other) phone systems for free)?
I don't have the option - I have a touchtone keypad with 12 buttons on it (the digits, * and #) which just generates the touchtones. BT actively marketed the things just after TTB was introduced. It's a bit of a cludge to use, so as I said, I do tend to try and use another phone for calls when I need a touchtone phone.
Larry Scutta
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue 16 Sep, 2003 00.52

cwathen wrote:I don't have the option - I have a touchtone keypad with 12 buttons on it (the digits, * and #) which just generates the touchtones. BT actively marketed the things just after TTB was introduced. It's a bit of a cludge to use, so as I said, I do tend to try and use another phone for calls when I need a touchtone phone.
Yes, they were quite common in the days before everywhee changed gto tone dialling. I was sent one when I signed up for Natwest's telephone banking about 10 years ago
James Hatts
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat 16 Aug, 2003 23.34
Location: London

Tone generators were also supplied with answering machines to enable you to dial in and listen to your messages remotely.
James Martin
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sun 15 Feb, 2004 19.26

Anyone remember the time when 1471 couldn't handle calls from mobiles?
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 7641
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.36
Location: Dundee

no but I do remember "the number you have called has changed. please prefix the code with 01" or whatever it used to be.

bless phONEday. it was so much fun.
"He has to be larger than bacon"
James Hatts
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat 16 Aug, 2003 23.34
Location: London

From today's Evening Standard:

New phone code change
Londoners buying news homes or starting businesses will be given the new 0203 telephone code as early as next summer, telecoms regulator Ofcom said today.

The code will cover the whole of London and will be applied to new lines issued to phone companies from July 2005. Existing 0207 and 0208 numbers will not change.

Grrr. When will these people learn?!

But the Ofcom press release really ought to carry a note urging journalists not to refer to 0207/0208 "codes".
Johnny
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri 22 Aug, 2003 20.18
Location: The London Borough of East London

James Hatts wrote:From today's Evening Standard:

New phone code change
Londoners buying news homes or starting businesses will be given the new 0203 telephone code as early as next summer, telecoms regulator Ofcom said today.

The code will cover the whole of London and will be applied to new lines issued to phone companies from July 2005. Existing 0207 and 0208 numbers will not change.

Grrr. When will these people learn?!

But the Ofcom press release really ought to carry a note urging journalists not to refer to 0207/0208 "codes".
Doh! beat me to it!

But this new one is very confusing. Why not have 020 3 & 7 for inner london & 020 4 & 8 for outer london.

The original rumour I heard was there wa soging to be a third number for all greater London area that didn't have a london postcode, i.e. Ilford IG1 whihc is right next door to Manor Park E12
Johnny

Harry Hill : "What is it about people that repair shoes that makes them so good at cutting keys? Try going in there with a shoe shaped like a key and see how confused they get."
James Hatts
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat 16 Aug, 2003 23.34
Location: London

Johnny wrote:But this new one is very confusing. Why not have 020 3 & 7 for inner london & 020 4 & 8 for outer london.
It's not confusing at all so long as people grasp the simple fact that London has ONE code (020) which is followed by an eight-digit number.

What the first digit of that number happens to be is of no consequence.
Johnny
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri 22 Aug, 2003 20.18
Location: The London Borough of East London

James Hatts wrote:
Johnny wrote:But this new one is very confusing. Why not have 020 3 & 7 for inner london & 020 4 & 8 for outer london.
It's not confusing at all so long as people grasp the simple fact that London has ONE code (020) which is followed by an eight-digit number.

What the first digit of that number happens to be is of no consequence.
I suppose so & conisering london is the only 020 coed area there is no problem. But when other areas do
Johnny

Harry Hill : "What is it about people that repair shoes that makes them so good at cutting keys? Try going in there with a shoe shaped like a key and see how confused they get."
Please Respond