Andrew wrote:I'm not a fan of a toc rebranding half way through their franchise period, as it just ends up with even more rebrands on top of the rebrand you get when the franchise changes hands anyway.
There are enough periods when rolling stock is in loads of different liveries without adding to it.
Sorry to have to correct you, but you are mistaken on two fronts there. This rebrand isn't in the middle of a franchise period, but rather it co-incides with the original start date of the beginning of a new 2 year management contract, which was subsequently extended to 4 years.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24378053
The DaFT decided that it would be better not to change the franchisee during such a period of upheaval (electrification) and as a sop to FG after the WCML debacle let them carry on running it.
Furthermore, this GWR brand is here to stay in perpetuity
regardless of franchisee, so there will be no further rebrands for the forseeable future. It is the DaFT's will that TOC names be subsidiary to the service brand name. Hence why Thameslink is back after a few years as "Capital Connect". It's only C2C, Arriva Trains Wales and the two Virgin franchises that operate using non-generic geographical identities now. Everyone else has a straightforward name that can easily be prefixed or suffixed by an operator, almost like the FA Cup.
- Northern Rail
Southern
(Abellio) Greater Anglia
Scotrail (operated by Abellio)
(First) Transpennine Express
MerseyRail
CrossCountry
South West Trains
SouthEastern
East Midlands Trains
Chiltern Railways
GWR (operated by First)
Thameslink
Great Northern
London Midland
London Overground / TfL Rail / Crossrail
Sure I've missed one out....
james2001 wrote:And presumably we have to pay for all this rebranding, changing livery, signage etc. through increased ticket costs too.
Cost of the rebrand is a mere drop in the ocean when it comes to railway costs.