They sell large blocks of Dairy Milk with Crunchie pieces in them, I assume it's the packaging for that.DJDave wrote:So Crunchie is dropping it's own branding I see, as long as they leave Wispa alone
Another High Street Rebrand
- tillyoshea
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Sun 23 Nov, 2003 14.34
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
- Contact:
And Caramel also dropping it's own brand. Again. Seems like no more than a couple of years since they made a big deal of giving it back it's own brand and bringing the bunny back. And I'm sure the creative blurb for that decision included the "fact" that it was important to have different brands to target different market sectors - Caramel was going upmarket, as I recall.DJDave wrote:So Crunchie is dropping it's own branding I see, as long as they leave Wispa alone
It's the same cycle M&S constantly rotates through: "We're losing market share because we've lost our focus. It's important to have a strong unified brand for everything, underlining our core values - axe all the sub-brands!" followed within years by "We're losing market share because we only appeal to a few people. Our core brand can't appeal to everyone - bring on the differentiating sub-brands!". Rinse and repeat.
The thing is given the shape of the bar, we don't know if the one shown was intended for this market or not.tillyoshea wrote:And Caramel also dropping it's own brand. Again. Seems like no more than a couple of years since they made a big deal of giving it back it's own brand and bringing the bunny back. And I'm sure the creative blurb for that decision included the "fact" that it was important to have different brands to target different market sectors - Caramel was going upmarket, as I recall.
They did exactly the same thing to US site Buy.com - a perhaps even more memorable domain name, which has now fully transitioned to Rakuten.com. I presume Play.com will eventually transition to Rankuten.com as its UK arm.wells wrote:The whole Rakuten things seems like madness to me too. What they've done is a bit like an unknown company buying Google then relegating it to a secondary brand.thegeek wrote:I understand that the whole Jersey VAT loophole has been closed, which sort of killed off the cheap CDs and DVDs racket - but I don't understand why Rakuten aren't using the play.com brand for their new streaming service. You know, the one with yer actual Buzz Aldrin in the adverts. And the really memorable name.
Also what's the website address? You'd think it was rakutenplay.com from the header and emails call it Rakutan's Play.com, all a bit confusing. Surely all the English language websites they run should probably just adopt the brilliantly simple Play brand?
Also, based on this awful corporate video on their US site, I bet not one of us has been pronouncing it correctly.
On the subject of pronunciation, I note Lidl have given up their attempts to have use use german vowels and are now using "all these lidl things" as a tagline...
oh and they're doing telly too. Are they losing out to Aldi?
oh and they're doing telly too. Are they losing out to Aldi?
"He has to be larger than bacon"
-
Square Eyes
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.38
Probably. Wonka bars are where its at nowWillPS wrote:For a brand with the cache of Cadburys Dairy Milk, it's surprising how often they seem to revise their branding. Are they losing market share or something?
- martindtanderson
- Posts: 527
- Joined: Tue 23 Dec, 2003 04.03
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
I think this counts as High Street. Philips has updated their logo.

http://brandingsource.blogspot.co.uk/20 ... ilips.html

http://brandingsource.blogspot.co.uk/20 ... ilips.html
Three years after the takeover, I find it interesting that Kraft has never placed its own logo on the back of any Cadbury's product, contrary to its usual policy of doing this to every acquired brand in its extensive global portfolio. I assume this may be to do with the negative feeling towards Kraft in the UK at the way the Cadbury's takeover was handled (particularly the broken promises on job losses).
I also note that Kraft-owned Toblerone have infiltrated this year's boxes of Cadbury's Heroes despite them not being a Cadbury's product. Maybe we'll also see Terry's Chocolate Orange segments appearing in the future?
I also note that Kraft-owned Toblerone have infiltrated this year's boxes of Cadbury's Heroes despite them not being a Cadbury's product. Maybe we'll also see Terry's Chocolate Orange segments appearing in the future?
Possibly to do with Kraft themselves spinning off Kraft Foods and rebranding as Mondelēz.rdobbie wrote:Three years after the takeover, I find it interesting that Kraft has never placed its own logo on the back of any Cadbury's product, contrary to its usual policy of doing this to every acquired brand in its extensive global portfolio. I assume this may be to do with the negative feeling towards Kraft in the UK at the way the Cadbury's takeover was handled (particularly the broken promises on job losses).
I also note that Kraft-owned Toblerone have infiltrated this year's boxes of Cadbury's Heroes despite them not being a Cadbury's product. Maybe we'll also see Terry's Chocolate Orange segments appearing in the future?
Why are they pronouncing it like that? It's got a U in it.Chris J wrote:They did exactly the same thing to US site Buy.com - a perhaps even more memorable domain name, which has now fully transitioned to Rakuten.com. I presume Play.com will eventually transition to Rankuten.com as its UK arm.wells wrote:The whole Rakuten things seems like madness to me too. What they've done is a bit like an unknown company buying Google then relegating it to a secondary brand.thegeek wrote:I understand that the whole Jersey VAT loophole has been closed, which sort of killed off the cheap CDs and DVDs racket - but I don't understand why Rakuten aren't using the play.com brand for their new streaming service. You know, the one with yer actual Buzz Aldrin in the adverts. And the really memorable name.
Also what's the website address? You'd think it was rakutenplay.com from the header and emails call it Rakutan's Play.com, all a bit confusing. Surely all the English language websites they run should probably just adopt the brilliantly simple Play brand?
Also, based on this awful corporate video on their US site, I bet not one of us has been pronouncing it correctly.
What an awful brand.
To follow up on this, today in Tesco I checked [Terry's] Chocolate Orange - which have been owned by Mondelēz a fair while and certainly had the Kraft logo at some point, and it didn't have either brand, only Mondelēz customer service details. The same was true of [new] Chocolate Orange Minis. So I guess the policy you refer to is no more, and it's not just related to Cadbury.WillPS wrote:Possibly to do with Kraft themselves spinning off Kraft Foods and rebranding as Mondelēz.rdobbie wrote:Three years after the takeover, I find it interesting that Kraft has never placed its own logo on the back of any Cadbury's product, contrary to its usual policy of doing this to every acquired brand in its extensive global portfolio. I assume this may be to do with the negative feeling towards Kraft in the UK at the way the Cadbury's takeover was handled (particularly the broken promises on job losses).
I also note that Kraft-owned Toblerone have infiltrated this year's boxes of Cadbury's Heroes despite them not being a Cadbury's product. Maybe we'll also see Terry's Chocolate Orange segments appearing in the future?

