
ChatPS Watch News and Information Board
-
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sat 08 Nov, 2008 19.48
It was Gavin who claimed civility. I'm just telling him he's a liar.Sput wrote:I think you should have just taken your "fuck off" on the chin tbh. Now you're just dragging out a conversation related to another conversation about dragging something out, and trying to establish some kind of moral basis for it to boot.bilky asko wrote:I'm sorry that I feel the need to respond to somebody telling me to shut up and fuck off. Or is my response unjustified towards that clearly civil manner?Sput wrote:Now, I don't actually look at TVF much but you're not exactly covering yourself in glory here, Bilky.
It's really just...shit.
And I'd just hold back there WillPS - it's not worth getting involved. I was trying to do the friendly warning thing, but I've become mired in it.
I do appreciate veiled warnings. I mean, that's the sort of moderation that TVF should be implementing.
I mean that it seems fairly obvious to me that there is some [deep-]rooted resentment against those involved with ChatPS by the higher-ups on here.Sput wrote:Say what you meanWillPS wrote:and you lot call ChatPS a clique?
I think "tsk" was the word used back in the day, wasn't it?
Oh look - iSon (remember him) has shown up to show his unwavering support for the party. Goodo.
Oh yes. We all like to go to the secret forum and embellish screenshots of the ChatPS page, adding moustaches and monocles to it using magic markers.
It's great fun. And is obviously the reason you've been banned ever since you launched the site.
It's great fun. And is obviously the reason you've been banned ever since you launched the site.
Knight knight
-
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sat 08 Nov, 2008 19.48
Of course, we've been accused of plotting some sort of destruction of TV Forum - sitting round, seeing what thread we can derail next, laughing at your attempts at derailment of the rota threads.
It's funny, the way the accuser is (in this case) the culprit.
It's funny, the way the accuser is (in this case) the culprit.
No, this is about the pot calling the kettle black, amongst other things.Pete wrote:Is this about your ugly sigs?WillPS wrote:I mean that it seems fairly obvious to me that there is some [deep-]rooted resentment against those involved with ChatPS by the higher-ups on here.
I didn't accuse you of doing any of those things and your explanation that you have not hasn't altered my opinion one jot.Sput wrote:Oh yes. We all like to go to the secret forum and embellish screenshots of the ChatPS page, adding moustaches and monocles to it using magic markers.
It's great fun. And is obviously the reason you've been banned ever since you launched the site.
-
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sat 08 Nov, 2008 19.48
Sorry I'm late to all of this, but why would you screenshot ChatPS? I could only really understand that if the site were some sort of clique..... which it isn't.WillPS wrote:I didn't accuse you of doing any of those things and your explanation that you have not hasn't altered my opinion one jot.Sput wrote:Oh yes. We all like to go to the secret forum and embellish screenshots of the ChatPS page, adding moustaches and monocles to it using magic markers.
It's great fun. And is obviously the reason you've been banned ever since you launched the site.