I have to agree with Pete, really. I don't think there's really anything wrong with him. I agree it was a very blunt response and could have been interpreted as rude, but it is down to how you interpreted it. It looks like it wasn't how he wanted it to be interpreted, anyway.bilky asko wrote:He has a long and illustrious history of acting high and mighty and bullying members, though.Pete wrote:Ha.WillPS wrote:https://twitter.com/MattJF/status/290908200193118211
Is it just me that thinks he should be banned for believing that his ITN badge and hairnet should turn him in to some kind of forum royalty? As we all know, such status is reserved for the administrators of spin-off discussion services.
But seriously though I wasn't sure what you were getting at with him, I don't find him overtly rude.
I mean he's tactless yes but when you're confronted with one of Brekkie's sermons from the mount claiming your incredibly complex new studio is a piece of piss you might be a bit blunt too.
Also, weren't some members very rude/demanding to/of him a few months ago, or something? Maybe I've made that up, but I have a feeling some members weren't getting the answers they wanted and moaning.