Also he knew Susan d'oily Osmon. Which led to this magnificent post
http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forums/post259827#post259827
TV Forum Watch News and Information Board
-
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sat 08 Nov, 2008 19.48
I can't say I agree with his sartorial advice. He foolishly claims that three-buttoned suits should only be fastened in the middle, and that having your suit jacket unbuttoned whilst standing is some sort of sacrilegious act.
An etiquette expert he may be; a sartorial expert he is not.
EDIT: After looking at his pictures again, his kissing cuff buttons are vile, his diagonal-striped tie is awful, and his tie knot is too large.
He can't criticise David Cameron's suits and then dress himself in that way.
An etiquette expert he may be; a sartorial expert he is not.
EDIT: After looking at his pictures again, his kissing cuff buttons are vile, his diagonal-striped tie is awful, and his tie knot is too large.
He can't criticise David Cameron's suits and then dress himself in that way.
They look pretty much identical to each other!bilky asko wrote:I can't say I agree with his sartorial advice. He foolishly claims that three-buttoned suits should only be fastened in the middle, and that having your suit jacket unbuttoned whilst standing is some sort of sacrilegious act.
An etiquette expert he may be; a sartorial expert he is not.
EDIT: After looking at his pictures again, his kissing cuff buttons are vile, his diagonal-striped tie is awful, and his tie knot is too large.
He can't criticise David Cameron's suits and then dress himself in that way.
Though he was born in 1989?! He looks at least 45. Years aren't kind...
- Gavin Scott
- Admin
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Perhaps its all the good living.
He'd better be careful, or he'll end up with gout.
He'd better be careful, or he'll end up with gout.
Meanwhile, in *whoosh* news, DaneilK spectacularly misses the point. Again.
http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forums/post750318#post-750318
Perhaps we should have a separate thread for comments re: the daybreak thread given its notoriety
http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forums/post750318#post-750318
Perhaps we should have a separate thread for comments re: the daybreak thread given its notoriety
"He has to be larger than bacon"
Central, dear. Always Central.WillPS wrote:Oh for the days of Central Independent Television plc.Beep wrote:His obsession with using company names grates on me. "GMTV Ltd." "ITV Breakfast Ltd." and so on, Daybreak and GMTV aren't so hard...
- Nick Harvey
- God
- Posts: 4160
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 22.26
- Location: Deepest Wiltshire
- Contact:
And, talking of *whoosh* news!Beep wrote:Central, dear. Always Central.
I'm amused by Phil94's disappointment that nobody seems to be interested in a random hour of Sky News last week having the "wrong" background. Even if he was in the UK, he would be watching far far too much of that channel. As for someone outside of the UK...