The Alternative Vote

[How] Did you vote for AV?

Yes to AV
29
71%
No to AV
10
24%
Didn't vote
2
5%
 
Total votes: 41
User avatar
DVB Cornwall
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 21.42

1513: Lib Dem minister Chris Huhne has conceded that the Yes camp looks set for defeat in the AV Referendum. He told the BBC he had no idea what the final percentages would be, but "if the boxes are anything like what I've seen it doesn't look good".

(BBC News)
Image
User avatar
iSon
Moderator
Posts: 1634
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 23.24
Location: London

More of a thumping defeat than even the No to AV campaign could have imagined. Not a great surprise in that the no vote will win the day.

I voted yes because I know what the system is and I want believe in the idea of voting reform. However, to the average person, I don't think a compelling case was made by the Yes to AV campaign that would persuade someone, who knew nothing about it, to vote yes.
Good Lord!
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 7629
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.36
Location: Dundee

Meanwhile, David Blunkett admits the that no2av claim of £250m was bullshit.

"We are in the middle of an election campaign. People in elections use made-up figures. I have never used the £250m figure. It [AV] would undoubtedly cost more but I have used an extra £90m."

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/poli ... 008341.ece (£)
http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-s ... e-blunkett
"He has to be larger than bacon"
User avatar
WillPS
Posts: 2557
Joined: Tue 22 Apr, 2008 18.32
Location: Carlton
Contact:

The way I see it, the no vote consisted of the following:
  • The essentially selfish masses of Conservative and hardline Labour who would of course see their safe-seats disappear with AV as people gained the confidence to vote according to their preference and not tactically.
  • The number of people with no interest in electoral-reform who instead treated the referendum as asking the question "Do you like Nick Clegg?".
The yes vote consisted of:
  • The crumbling Lib Dem support network
  • Supporters of other minor parties
  • Progressive Labour supporters (who can bypass the aforementioned selfish urge)
When you look at it like that, I'm surprised we even managed to rustle up 30%.
Image
Philip
Posts: 1171
Joined: Fri 22 Feb, 2008 21.23
Location: Merseyside
Contact:

NO WINS.

:D
Image
User avatar
DVB Cornwall
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 21.42

Thankfully we have a conclusive result.
Image
User avatar
Pete
Posts: 7629
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.36
Location: Dundee

DVB Cornwall wrote:Thankfully we have a conclusive result.
Yes, so superior to the general election in that regard.
"He has to be larger than bacon"
Jovis
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri 25 Aug, 2006 20.08

It's fine, there were only two choices in the referendum, so FPTP was bound to work for it - just like in all other elections.
User avatar
martindtanderson
Posts: 527
Joined: Tue 23 Dec, 2003 04.03
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Progressive Labour supporters

I guess that includes me then, now I am regretting voting for the LibDems...
Image
User avatar
WillPS
Posts: 2557
Joined: Tue 22 Apr, 2008 18.32
Location: Carlton
Contact:

martindtanderson wrote:Progressive Labour supporters

I guess that includes me then, now I am regretting voting for the LibDems...
At least you can bask in the knowledge your vote was wasted thanks to First Past the Post! :D

Would the referendum have returned a different result if the question was phrased "From the next General Election, which voting system would you prefer to see used to elect MPs? - First Past the Post - Alternative Vote"?
Image
User avatar
DVB Cornwall
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2005 21.42

Final Result

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6,152,607 Yes
Votes so far 'Yes': 32.1%

13,013,123 No
Votes so far 'No': 67.9%


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Voting areas declared: 440 / 440

Admittedly better than I hoped for.
Image
Please Respond