Surprisingly, it's nearer to 20 years old. It was definitely around in 1993 and I seem to recall it was first unveiled as early as 1991.WillPS wrote:Hardly iconic - it's barely 10 years old!Invent Meridian wrote:Oh dear, why would Bhs want to ditch their iconic 'script' logo in favour of that dull, plain Sans Serif text?
That's really surprised me - I had no idea the 1980s logo was still on shop fronts today. It looks so dated that it seriously damages the store's image. I really don't understand it; companies like BHS must spend a fortune on the other arms of their marketing and presentation, so you'd think it'd be relatively cheap to stick a few new signs up where they matter most.Inspector Sands wrote:Not the worst, BHS are very inconsistant. Have a look at this branch of BhS: http://bit.ly/cPPIKq
I can think of many instances of retailers failing to update exterior signage across all their stores. In most cases it's understandable (e.g. when M&S changed its logo from one minimalist font to a slightly different minimalist font) but this is remarkable because that 1980's BhS logo is so heavily stylised and rooted in its decade. Even "normal" people (i.e. not branding anoraks like us) must surely notice that it's a bit of a shocker.
It smacks of a "head in the sand" corporate mentality, à la Woolworths and Little Chef pre-Blumenthal.
