Whats your opinions on the goal that was never to be in the Germany - England match. Do you think technology is needed to stop things like this happening in the future.
Watch here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3onu9ORTrjA
The disallowed goal - Could it have turned the match around
Football on Metropol. Who'd have thunk it?
Yes, of course. Why not? It's used in other major sports. And it would prevent us listening to England fans giving off for the next 40 years.
Having said that, that goal wasn't borderline, it was clearly and obviously over the line, I knew that without seeing a replay.
Oh and it may prevent "The referee's a wanker" being loudly chanted on BBC ONE on a Sunday afternoon.
Yes, of course. Why not? It's used in other major sports. And it would prevent us listening to England fans giving off for the next 40 years.
Having said that, that goal wasn't borderline, it was clearly and obviously over the line, I knew that without seeing a replay.
Oh and it may prevent "The referee's a wanker" being loudly chanted on BBC ONE on a Sunday afternoon.
You may be right. Thread title changed. At least we don't have to see this ad any more : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjOvTArUqmQ Every cloud has a silver lining.Jovis wrote:I actually think the game could have ended differently had the goal been allowed.
- Nick Harvey
- God
- Posts: 4158
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 22.26
- Location: Deepest Wiltshire
- Contact:
I agree. We'd have lost 4-2 instead of 4-1.Jovis wrote:I actually think the game could have ended differently had the goal been allowed.
We'd still have had to come home, though. We'd still have had to sack the silly Italian chap, though.
So differently, but not very differently.
Thank heavens it's over.
I am sure sky NEWS would have ran with it for weeks, with special graphics and a virtual football pitch.dosxuk wrote:At least we didn't lose 2-1 (or 3-2, 4-3, etc), so the disallowed goal isn't a deciding one. The follow up if it was a deciding goal would have been unbearable.
- GavBelfast
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed 28 Oct, 2009 22.13
- Location: Dundonald, Co Down
The English FA helped to put Sepp Blatter where he is, in the mistaken belief that he would give England the World Cup Finals in 2006.
He didn't support England's bid, and he doesn't support goal-line technology either.
Kismet, eh?
He didn't support England's bid, and he doesn't support goal-line technology either.
Kismet, eh?
The German goalkeeper was *nom*
http://img.skysports.com/09/08/800x600/ ... 346810.jpg
Anyway, England were diabolical and the Germans fully deserved to win. Never mind.
http://img.skysports.com/09/08/800x600/ ... 346810.jpg
Anyway, England were diabolical and the Germans fully deserved to win. Never mind.
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.38
The pound shops will be gutted that they can't shift any more cheap tat with the St. Georges flag on it.
Perhaps they can collect them up from the central reservations of motorways up and down this land in readiness to flog them next time.
Perhaps they can collect them up from the central reservations of motorways up and down this land in readiness to flog them next time.
Agreed. England didn't deserve to win in any shape or form. Abysmal display from a team whose combined wealth could easily ease the poverty in South Africa.Nick Harvey wrote:I agree. We'd have lost 4-2 instead of 4-1.Jovis wrote:I actually think the game could have ended differently had the goal been allowed.