Vince Cable as The Chancellor

Chie
Posts: 979
Joined: Fri 31 Aug, 2007 05.03

Sput wrote:By describing it as bonkers you're suggesting there's no rational basis for doing any of them. How confident are you of that, chie? I mean, do you think if I hit a couple of search engines for half an hour I might be able to turn up something that suggests it's not insane or that if I ran the numbers for your "house" it'd be realistic?
I'm not saying there's not a rational basis for doing *any* of them, but quite a few of them are just bizzare.

And I *know* that if I'd started working when I was 18, I would have saved roughly £30,000 by now, which is a deposit and then some. And a car. :| What makes you think otherwise?
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

So I heard you're 22? That's 7.5 grand a year essentially spare

On the minimum wage

With rent, taxes, food, bills and actually experiencing being a human?

Shall I run those numbers?
Knight knight
Jovis
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri 25 Aug, 2006 20.08

Sput wrote:On the minimum wage
Remember, it's the minimum wage for younger people.

Please do, Sput.
Chie
Posts: 979
Joined: Fri 31 Aug, 2007 05.03

23 next month.

Go ahead, if you really want to. You'll need to factor in the £13,800 I've earned since I was 17 through self-employment (which I could do alongside a full-time job) and the fact I've never been asked to pay board.
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

So not only have one job, but TWO? How about transport to this mythical day job?
Knight knight
Chie
Posts: 979
Joined: Fri 31 Aug, 2007 05.03

Sput wrote:So not only have one job, but TWO? How about transport to this mythical day job?
That's hard to say, as it depends where the mythical job is, doesn't it? It could be within walking distance or it could be 10 miles away, in which case an annual unlimited travel card costs £630 per year. But I think walking/cycling distance is more likely.
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

Please tell me you realise how unrepresentative of almost every normal human being you are
Knight knight
User avatar
WillPS
Posts: 2557
Joined: Tue 22 Apr, 2008 18.32
Location: Carlton
Contact:

Sput wrote: what i THINK he's suggesting is that it might not be okay to have a chancellor with ties to an industry that's heavily taxed and the focus of government policy.

I know, MENTAL isn't he.
Spot on.
Image
User avatar
GavBelfast
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed 28 Oct, 2009 22.13
Location: Dundonald, Co Down

WillPS wrote:
Sput wrote: what i THINK he's suggesting is that it might not be okay to have a chancellor with ties to an industry that's heavily taxed and the focus of government policy.

I know, MENTAL isn't he.
Spot on.

Clearly, such a role would be incompatible with a being a Government minister.

But I think the view that he is much better qualified than any of the three would-be Chancellors holds.
Please Respond