The static-powered explosive and elephant detector...

User avatar
marksi
Posts: 1892
Joined: Wed 07 Jan, 2004 05.38
Location: Donaghadee

This story completely staggers me, because it is instantly obvious to me that this guy has come up with a device which is utter bollocks and yet it seems the Iraqi government has spend $85M on them. He's been charging $40K for each one, which appears to consist of plastic, a telescopic aerial from Maplin and some RFID tags costing 2-3p each.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/n ... 471187.stm
The UK government has announced a ban on the export to Iraq and Afghanistan of some so-called "bomb detectors".
It follows an investigation by the BBC's Newsnight programme which found that one type of "detector" made by a British company cannot work.
The Iraqi government has spent $85m on the ADE-651 and there are concerns that they have failed to stop bomb attacks that have killed hundreds of people.
The ban on the ADE-651 and other similar devices starts next week.
There are no batteries and it consists of a swivelling aerial mounted to a hinge on a hand-grip. Critics have likened it to a glorified dowsing rod.
Mr McCormick told the BBC in a previous interview that "the theory behind dowsing and the theory behind how we actually detect explosives is very similar".
He says that the key to it is the black box connected to the aerial into which you put "programmed substance detection cards", each "designed to tune into" the frequency of a particular explosive or other substance named on the card.
He claims that in ideal conditions you can detect explosives from a range of up to 1km.
The training manual for the device says it can even, with the right card, detect elephants, humans and 100 dollar bills.
User avatar
Nick Harvey
God
Posts: 4160
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 22.26
Location: Deepest Wiltshire
Contact:

The only downside to this story is that the first person to get hold of it was Clinton Rogers of Pants Worst!
User avatar
Sput
Posts: 7547
Joined: Wed 20 Aug, 2003 19.57

The truly depressing thing is that this story has been doing the geekier rounds for a number of months, and it took a Newsnight investigation for anything to happen, presumably because the papers are now so ignorant of science that they were taken in by the sciency sounding words from the makers of this thing. One to bear in mind when the newspapers complain about the death of "proper" journalism.
Knight knight
User avatar
Nick Harvey
God
Posts: 4160
Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 22.26
Location: Deepest Wiltshire
Contact:

Indeed. Clinton's original interview with the guy is being described as 'about a year ago'.
Please Respond