It was a punt. She could have gathered some momentum but her LGBT comments didn’t help and ultimately Lorraine finished her off I think.bilky asko wrote: ↑Thu 13 Jun, 2019 20.01Commiserations on losing that tenner.all new Phil wrote: ↑Sat 25 May, 2019 21.40 I’ve stuck a tenner on Esther McVey, got it at 80/1. She’s taking it seriously.
End of MAY
-
- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sun 13 Feb, 2005 00.04
- Location: Next door to Hell
She is a lightweight who comes across as very cold. I think she may have picked up handful more votes if it wasn’t for the events of last week but she was never going to go far.
I’m sure she’ll have appealed to average Daily Mail/Daily Express reader with unsubstantiated claims though.
I can only imagine how she’d fair against someone like James O’Brien.
I think the Tories need Rory Stewart, as he’s the only one in the centre ground and I think he’s the only one that could deliver a comfortable majority. But he’s not Brexity enough for the membership at the moment. But next time round however when the Tories aren’t doing well especially if Brexit’s gone badly they’ll probably decide they need someone like him.
I’m sure she’ll have appealed to average Daily Mail/Daily Express reader with unsubstantiated claims though.
I can only imagine how she’d fair against someone like James O’Brien.
I think the Tories need Rory Stewart, as he’s the only one in the centre ground and I think he’s the only one that could deliver a comfortable majority. But he’s not Brexity enough for the membership at the moment. But next time round however when the Tories aren’t doing well especially if Brexit’s gone badly they’ll probably decide they need someone like him.
-
- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sun 13 Feb, 2005 00.04
- Location: Next door to Hell
It’s not just the Tories who need Rory Stewart, it’s the country. He seems to be one of the only ones on either side of the political spectrum right now who can operate respectfully - either Johnson or Corbyn as leader would cause massive division. Everyone else is too angry as well.
-
- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sun 13 Feb, 2005 00.04
- Location: Next door to Hell
The man himself isn’t particularly disrespectful but fuck me, the people who surround him are probably some of the coarsest and divisive in politics.
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sat 30 Apr, 2016 00.24
Just a thought and I don't know if it would be possible. The day before the new leader is announced, could May go to Buckingham Palace and ask for permission to dissolve Parliament trigging a General Election? It is said that the Queen doesn't get involved really in politics and leaves that up to her Prime Minister?
-
- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sun 13 Feb, 2005 00.04
- Location: Next door to Hell
For what reason?simonipswich1 wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun, 2019 12.42 Just a thought and I don't know if it would be possible. The day before the new leader is announced, could May go to Buckingham Palace and ask for permission to dissolve Parliament trigging a General Election? It is said that the Queen doesn't get involved really in politics and leaves that up to her Prime Minister?
- tillyoshea
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Sun 23 Nov, 2003 14.34
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
- Contact:
No. The Prime Minister lost the prerogative to reuqest a dissolution of Parliament under the Fixed Term Parliaments Act. It now requires a vote of two-thirds of the Commons (or a situation where the Government loses a confidence vote and there is a period of two weeks where no alternative Government emerges to command the confidence of the Commons).simonipswich1 wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun, 2019 12.42 Just a thought and I don't know if it would be possible. The day before the new leader is announced, could May go to Buckingham Palace and ask for permission to dissolve Parliament trigging a General Election? It is said that the Queen doesn't get involved really in politics and leaves that up to her Prime Minister?
I mean, I'm sure the monarch could theoretically dissolve a Parliament at will, but we'd be well into Charles I territory if it happened in the circumstances outlined.
And - as Phil says - why would May want to do that anyway?!
-
- Posts: 1426
- Joined: Sat 08 Nov, 2008 19.48
Please don't bet on him, you'll lose another tenner.all new Phil wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun, 2019 10.39 It’s not just the Tories who need Rory Stewart, it’s the country. He seems to be one of the only ones on either side of the political spectrum right now who can operate respectfully - either Johnson or Corbyn as leader would cause massive division. Everyone else is too angry as well.
-
- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sun 13 Feb, 2005 00.04
- Location: Next door to Hell
I’m well and truly resigned to the idea of PM Boris.bilky asko wrote: ↑Mon 17 Jun, 2019 00.42Please don't bet on him, you'll lose another tenner.all new Phil wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun, 2019 10.39 It’s not just the Tories who need Rory Stewart, it’s the country. He seems to be one of the only ones on either side of the political spectrum right now who can operate respectfully - either Johnson or Corbyn as leader would cause massive division. Everyone else is too angry as well.
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sat 30 Apr, 2016 00.24
Why would she want to do that? I suppose to stick two fingers up at the Party and Parliament!tillyoshea wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun, 2019 17.17No. The Prime Minister lost the prerogative to reuqest a dissolution of Parliament under the Fixed Term Parliaments Act. It now requires a vote of two-thirds of the Commons (or a situation where the Government loses a confidence vote and there is a period of two weeks where no alternative Government emerges to command the confidence of the Commons).simonipswich1 wrote: ↑Sun 16 Jun, 2019 12.42 Just a thought and I don't know if it would be possible. The day before the new leader is announced, could May go to Buckingham Palace and ask for permission to dissolve Parliament trigging a General Election? It is said that the Queen doesn't get involved really in politics and leaves that up to her Prime Minister?
I mean, I'm sure the monarch could theoretically dissolve a Parliament at will, but we'd be well into Charles I territory if it happened in the circumstances outlined.
And - as Phil says - why would May want to do that anyway?!