Metropol

What? Why, the Sony Ericsson K800i of course. Would post all my reasons why, but just click the link.

Bit ugly.

You know how I feel about personal insults Adam. I know you could not POSSIBLY mean the phone.

(Crumbs, I'm turning into Nick with capitals there..)

Probably too expensive too...

Probally a bit shit too. I've the the k750i, it's pretty good for a phone, the size of the images is fairly impressive, but the quality and focusing leave a bit to be desired.

Best bet is to buy a cheap mobile and a high end digital camera.

Or both? I have the W800 at the moment, had the K750 last year. Very impressive images. The beauty being I always take my mobile with me, and if out for a night and want to grab a few snaps without risking losing my digital camera, a bit of a bugger to carry around and easily lost whilst pissed, I don't mind paying a bit more for a decent camera on a mobile.

If you've already got the W800 why do you need that?

I've only just got myself a W550i and I'm loving it.

Because the camera is even better, and I want a 3G phone for video calls which the K800 has.

rts wrote:Because the camera is even better, and I want a 3G phone for video calls which the K800 has.

How many people do you know who use video calls though?

YAY at last! Someone else with a 3g phone! Can I video call you row?

Who needs a colour screen phone? they are flimsy and very breakable - I would never own one in my life. But I do have a Nokia 6630 (I need to buy an orange 3g SIM for it though).

This phone is a smartphone, not one of those crappy style-over-substance models like everything else is.


Now the 6310i, has GPRS, bluetooth, is monochrome and virtually indestructible! (mine has the marks to prove that).