Online Banking Services: Why so much red tape?
Posted: Fri 06 Jan, 2006 00.19
Away from all the politics, here's another thread about something which isn't so terribly important. At some point tonight, my wages will clear through my account. This is usually around 1-2AM, but sometimes as early as midnight, and other times as late as 8AM. Being totally skint but up for a few bevvies, I wouldn't mind finding out before morning.
I *could* go the cash machine which is 5 minutes walk away and check, but if it hasn't gone in, it just means another walk back home again, and then another walk out which could also be fruitless, and so on and so on.
But I don't need to do that - I live in the age of Internet Banking. I regularly use it on an account I hold with another bank and I find it so simple and useful - once you're allowed to access it that is.
Which brings me to the point of this post - why is it, that every single bank requires you to specifically register to use their online service, be given a separate online logon number even though you are allready uniquely identifiable with your sort code and account number, and then to wait for a seperate password/security number/whatever they call it this week to be sent through the post even though they allready have a PIN number, telephone security code, and a myriad of other security questions they could request of you?
Even accepting that the separate security number is necessary, why must it be sent through the post? Why can't they email it to the email address which they hold on your account details?
Putting any of this to a bank will result in a usual fobbed off answer of 'it's for security reasons'. But hang on - I can go to any number of online retailers, pull a few details off my debit card, and go buying stuff which will be debited to my account! If online banking is such a serious business that you need separate ID's for it and information to be posted to you before you can use it 'for security reasons' then why is it acceptable to be able to charge things to one's account without any such red-tape.
If a card number, account name, expiry date, and card security number is sufficient information to let Amazon take £30 out of my account when buying a couple of DVD's, then so should the same/other readily available information be sufficient for Natwest to allow me to see how much money is in my account without having to wait for bits of paper to be sent through the post.
The conspiracy theorist in me suggests that this is yet another example of profile-mania, where every single online service you encounter, for no good reason, requires you to create a profile of yourself that will ultimately be used for targetted junk mail.
I see no doubts of the validity of my attempting to get onto online banking which couldn't be resolved by security questions on the myriad of personal information which a bank holds on me, and I see nothing more secure about expecting you to hang around for several days waiting for a bit of paper (which anyone could intercept) to be sent to you.
[/slightly over-excessive rant mode]
I *could* go the cash machine which is 5 minutes walk away and check, but if it hasn't gone in, it just means another walk back home again, and then another walk out which could also be fruitless, and so on and so on.
But I don't need to do that - I live in the age of Internet Banking. I regularly use it on an account I hold with another bank and I find it so simple and useful - once you're allowed to access it that is.
Which brings me to the point of this post - why is it, that every single bank requires you to specifically register to use their online service, be given a separate online logon number even though you are allready uniquely identifiable with your sort code and account number, and then to wait for a seperate password/security number/whatever they call it this week to be sent through the post even though they allready have a PIN number, telephone security code, and a myriad of other security questions they could request of you?
Even accepting that the separate security number is necessary, why must it be sent through the post? Why can't they email it to the email address which they hold on your account details?
Putting any of this to a bank will result in a usual fobbed off answer of 'it's for security reasons'. But hang on - I can go to any number of online retailers, pull a few details off my debit card, and go buying stuff which will be debited to my account! If online banking is such a serious business that you need separate ID's for it and information to be posted to you before you can use it 'for security reasons' then why is it acceptable to be able to charge things to one's account without any such red-tape.
If a card number, account name, expiry date, and card security number is sufficient information to let Amazon take £30 out of my account when buying a couple of DVD's, then so should the same/other readily available information be sufficient for Natwest to allow me to see how much money is in my account without having to wait for bits of paper to be sent through the post.
The conspiracy theorist in me suggests that this is yet another example of profile-mania, where every single online service you encounter, for no good reason, requires you to create a profile of yourself that will ultimately be used for targetted junk mail.
I see no doubts of the validity of my attempting to get onto online banking which couldn't be resolved by security questions on the myriad of personal information which a bank holds on me, and I see nothing more secure about expecting you to hang around for several days waiting for a bit of paper (which anyone could intercept) to be sent to you.
[/slightly over-excessive rant mode]