Page 1 of 4

What a w*nker

Posted: Mon 04 Oct, 2004 00.02
by rts
Michael Howard.

Isn't he a complete and utter twat.

Posted: Mon 04 Oct, 2004 00.09
by Dr Lobster*
personally, i think he would make a good pm - he certainly seems to be able to think on his feet. blair has totally lost it, he looks frail and worn out - gordon brown seems to be devoid of personality, not an instantly likable character at all.

Posted: Mon 04 Oct, 2004 00.21
by rts
Michael Howard, Home Secretary? Brings back some memories doesn't it!

In all honesty, I created this thread to be deliberately provocative, but we are all able to state our opinions in a concise and inoffensive form. I still need to state mine, but want to see which way the thread steers.

So far, I am very intrigued.

Posted: Mon 04 Oct, 2004 00.23
by Brad
I tend to veer towards the right politically, but still think Portillo would have made a better leader than Howard if he had stood for leader. The Tories winning the next election seems most unlikely, but I don't feel I could support UKIP for two reasons. Firstly, all we hear is their 'lets get out of the EU policies' and absolutely nothing else, and secondly the ghastly creation, that sub-human form of mankind that refers to itself as Robert Kilroy-Silk. ;)

Posted: Mon 04 Oct, 2004 00.34
by Dr Lobster*
i'd loved to have seen ken clarke as tory leader - he's one of the remaining few tory heavy-weights left.

he's got a certain cigar smoking laid back charm which i think is quiet refreshing in a politician

Posted: Mon 04 Oct, 2004 00.41
by Brad
Image

Boris for PM!!! ;)

Ken Clarke is a bit too Euro for my liking. And as for Nicholas 'Fatty' Soames, my ex-local MP in Mid Sussex... No way. The man who denied Gulf War Syndrome existed and just to prove it personally ordered all medical papers from the soldiers suffering from symptoms to be burnt. :o

Posted: Mon 04 Oct, 2004 01.05
by rts
nodnirG kraM wrote:(Do you have proof of Mr Howard's masturbational tendancies?)
Him and Michael Jackson took advatage of me when I was 5.

Posted: Mon 04 Oct, 2004 01.30
by Marcus
nodnirG kraM wrote:
rts wrote:Michael Howard, Home Secretary? Brings back some memories doesn't it!

In all honesty, I created this thread to be deliberately provocative, but we are all able to state our opinions in a concise and inoffensive form. I still need to state mine, but want to see which way the thread steers.

So far, I am very intrigued.
No, no, by all means state your opinions, but you're gonna have to justify them!! Lol! Come on back them up with WHY Michael Howard is a wanker, otherwise we could just have threads for everyone we want to libel!!
How about the Poll Tax and Section 28

Posted: Mon 04 Oct, 2004 08.58
by rts
In regards to the Tories on the whole, 16% interest rates on your mortgage, and oh yes, how much did Britain lose that very black Tuesday? Cheers Norman.

Posted: Mon 04 Oct, 2004 10.38
by Brad
Rather that than have a party in power that secretly wants to rename this country 'Great Europe, British Division' ;)

Posted: Tue 05 Oct, 2004 13.03
by Johnny
The Economy is good at present. Unemployment is very low.

The Tories were in 18 years afterall, Labour have only been in 7, so they still have time to turn it round

Bloody hell if The Tories had stayed in in 1997 could you imagine how worse it could have got. The British Rail privitisation was rushed through by the tories in 1996! The Underground probably would have got FULL privitisation if they had stayed in. To be honest they're all as bad as one another.

Tories - Lies & Old fashioned ways
Labour - Let down
Lib Dems - Still liable to sit on the fence
UKIP - F*ck off don't make my laugh, SILK!

End of rant! :)