Re: whyPhone?
Posted: Tue 29 Sep, 2009 15.51
There is a rumbling in some of the articles that apple has a say in setting the package prices. I mean, o2 justify £7.50 of the contract price by claiming it covers Visual Voicemail.
That's totally shocking. What right do apple have to stipulate ongoing charging to end users? They're not even in the telecoms market.Sput wrote:There is a rumbling in some of the articles that apple has a say in setting the package prices. I mean, o2 justify £7.50 of the contract price by claiming it covers Visual Voicemail.
The truly shocking thing is not that Apple demands it, but that networks actually AGREE to itBut Apple's demands for a share of user revenue, as well as control over the pricing and marketing of their baby, put some operators off signing a deal with Cupertino. This will likely result in near-identical offerings, differing only in the colours of the attached logos.
Our understanding is that Apple not only reserves the right to get involved in pricing of handsets, but also expects "partner" operators to contribute generously to Apple-controlled advertising. This is on top of the ongoing revenue share to which operators around the world have signed up. Operators used to demand exclusivity before agreeing to such things, but such is the lure of the iPhone, that Apple can call the tune without having to offer the additional inducement of an exclusive deal.
I hate to be special guest starring as Mr Q, but ultimately, why should they not have that right, in so much as if they want to stipulate in their deals with networks, 'you can carry the iPhone if you charge x for y", then surely that should be for them to argue out. After all, it's not like the networks should have some immediate entitlement to carry a phone on their own terms, just as it's not my right to demand my package price.Gavin Scott wrote:That's totally shocking. What right do apple have to stipulate ongoing charging to end users? They're not even in the telecoms market.Sput wrote:There is a rumbling in some of the articles that apple has a say in setting the package prices. I mean, o2 justify £7.50 of the contract price by claiming it covers Visual Voicemail.
As for £7.50 to be able to pick the third voicemail message from a list instead of going one at a time - that's mental. Can you opt out of that?
You're right. I withdraw the rhestorical question, "what right do they have", but I'll leave in "shocked" and add an "outraged".lukey wrote:I hate to be special guest starring as Mr Q, but ultimately, why should they not have that right, in so much as if they want to stipulate in their deals with networks, 'you can carry the iPhone if you charge x for y", then surely that should be for them to argue out. After all, it's not like the networks should have some immediate entitlement to carry a phone on their own terms, just as it's not my right to demand my package price.
I'm not sure I do either, but now they're coming to Vodafone I may be sorely tempted. My next phone of choice was going to be the Samsung Galaxy I7500 which is an Android phone, and apparently very good. It's on an o2 exclusivity thingy at the moment but only for a few weeks.marksi wrote:I don't want an iPhone.
They are coming to Orange as well.scottishtv wrote:I'm not sure I do either, but now they're coming to Vodafone I may be sorely tempted. My next phone of choice was going to be the Samsung Galaxy I7500 which is an Android phone, and apparently very good. It's on an o2 exclusivity thingy at the moment but only for a few weeks.marksi wrote:I don't want an iPhone.
I'll likely want to stay with O2 as I get a £5 per month discount on my O2 broadband if I do, and O2 reception around here is very good.scottishtv wrote:I'm not sure I do either, but now they're coming to Vodafone I may be sorely tempted. My next phone of choice was going to be the Samsung Galaxy I7500 which is an Android phone, and apparently very good. It's on an o2 exclusivity thingy at the moment but only for a few weeks.marksi wrote:I don't want an iPhone.