Metropol

I made a good post today too sir, can't I have the other half of that Curly Wurly?

Seven nicker, eh? He never shouldn't have swallowed that working philosopher's stone as a drunken dare, wouldn't be having this problem of a devalued £7 then.

James H wrote:CUNT ALERT - YOU ARE A GRADE A CUNT

I'm underwhelmed. If you were going to make an impromptu statement I expected better than that.

Fail at GCSE 'Metropol Communications' Tsk!

Nick Harvey wrote:Yes, James, you've summed up nicely what by far the majority of us are thinking.

Is it *fact*, or just one of your random thoughts?

nodnirG kraM wrote:All I have left for you is seven pounds Sterling. Which by the morning will be worth less than that Curly Wurly after Mr H has consumed it.

It's ok, I'll give him a John Lewis gift voucher.

And who said I was trying to impress you Cuntstead? I was merely telling you what you are. Less an impromptu statement and more a considered judgement.

James H wrote:It's ok, I'll give him a John Lewis gift voucher.

Who's this "he" chappie and what value is this voucher?

Nini wrote:

James H wrote:It's ok, I'll give him a John Lewis gift voucher.

Who's this "he" chappie and what value is this voucher?

Sorry, I was so preoccupied with calling Stu a cunt that I nearly made the whole post about him.

Of course what I meant to say was "her" and it will be £10, with love from me to you.

Yay! A traditional metroxmas.
Goodwill to all men and mices.

Bloody hell Plymouth, really, what's your payoff here? >_>

EDIT: The post I was referring to be deleted. Of course...

Mmm, I noticed the post had been deleted after I tried to reply to it.

He wrote something about evidence for me calling him a cunt, and what I said being a "profound statement".

"Or do you have nothing to say, as per usual." - or something like that.

The last sentence he seemed not to know what I was talking about. How banal and twattish he really is.

It was a PM, Jimmy, and it's now stuck in the out-box

I think we need an eJanitor; where did we leave the last one? :roll:

Gosh, what an amazing display of human ignorance we've developed in here.

For all of James H's bad language - I think he pretty much sums up what the whole "argument" has been about. I need not say any more because Stuart* has not addressed any of the key points, instead choosing to wail that he's being insulted for stating his glorious facts.

But, the most important point is this:

WHY IS MY GLORIOUS THREAD BEING INVADED BY CRETINOUS BEHAVIOUR?