Jamez's leaving thread
- Gavin Scott
- Admin
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
I stand corrected. Not a post of anger but a PM, which I will read and respond to.
-
- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Sat 30 Aug, 2003 20.14
i find it funny he blasted craigf for the very same thing.
i would never have guessed jamez was sideshow ed, but it makes sense now.
it looks like he just can't leave - i'm sure he'll be back posting over-exposed black and white photos of himself very soon.
i would never have guessed jamez was sideshow ed, but it makes sense now.
it looks like he just can't leave - i'm sure he'll be back posting over-exposed black and white photos of himself very soon.
Upload service: http://www.metropol247.co.uk/uploadservice
-
- Posts: 1011
- Joined: Sun 15 Feb, 2004 19.26
Let him come back, rather than all this pointless bullying.
And Gavin, I think you're beginning to take the piss a little bit, don't you?
Who incidentally was accused of being a paedophile? I don't remember that bit.
And Gavin, I think you're beginning to take the piss a little bit, don't you?
Who incidentally was accused of being a paedophile? I don't remember that bit.
It was edited out for legal reasons.James Martin wrote:Let him come back, rather than all this pointless bullying.
And Gavin, I think you're beginning to take the piss a little bit, don't you?
Who incidentally was accused of being a paedophile? I don't remember that bit.
- Gavin Scott
- Admin
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Fri 15 Aug, 2003 13.16
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
James, with the greatest of respect, what you don't know could fill a warehouse.James Martin wrote:Let him come back, rather than all this pointless bullying.
And Gavin, I think you're beginning to take the piss a little bit, don't you?
Who incidentally was accused of being a paedophile? I don't remember that bit.
I'm going to let someone else explain the finer points of the last week or so as I really don't have the energy.
Perhaps Jamez/J2 himself could do the honours.
-
- Posts: 1011
- Joined: Sun 15 Feb, 2004 19.26
Could somebody fill me in via means of PM? Or are we talking about Simon Luxton naming the below age-of-consent cast members of Grange Hill that he fancies on his own website ?
No one was accused of being a paedophile at all!
The point was raised about a well-known middle-aged TVF member running an internet forum which encouraged young girls to sign up to and also having discussions about particular adolecent girls they fancied. I commented that this behavior was "questionable". At no point did I imply, insinuate or indeed, allege anything.
It just shows that a couple of members here enjoy stirring up shit to fuel forum thread frenzies.
The username "Jamez" will not be making a return as it is widely viewed to be associated with sometimes offensive and childish comments.
This is my new username, and I do hope that a line can be drawn under the events which have taken place over the last few days. I have been in touch with Asa and Gavin privately, and therefore I have nothing else to add publically.
The point was raised about a well-known middle-aged TVF member running an internet forum which encouraged young girls to sign up to and also having discussions about particular adolecent girls they fancied. I commented that this behavior was "questionable". At no point did I imply, insinuate or indeed, allege anything.
It just shows that a couple of members here enjoy stirring up shit to fuel forum thread frenzies.
The username "Jamez" will not be making a return as it is widely viewed to be associated with sometimes offensive and childish comments.
This is my new username, and I do hope that a line can be drawn under the events which have taken place over the last few days. I have been in touch with Asa and Gavin privately, and therefore I have nothing else to add publically.
-
- Posts: 1011
- Joined: Sun 15 Feb, 2004 19.26
Excellent news!
Welcome back James P. This forum was a worse-off place without thee.
As far as I'm aware, this was all it was about. I personally would agree that admitting to fancying certain underage actresses on a public website is, at best, highly questionable behaviour.
Welcome back James P. This forum was a worse-off place without thee.
As far as I'm aware, this was all it was about. I personally would agree that admitting to fancying certain underage actresses on a public website is, at best, highly questionable behaviour.
-
- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Sat 30 Aug, 2003 20.14
so in the two or three days since you left the forum for the second time, you've also had a new brain installed?J2 wrote:The username "Jamez" will not be making a return as it is widely viewed to be associated with sometimes offensive and childish comments.
how long have we got to wait until you sign up as another user to take the piss out of yourself?
Upload service: http://www.metropol247.co.uk/uploadservice
Please don't get excited, James. I merely logged off on Friday night in a huff because of Gavin's over-the-top reaction to misinterpreted comments.James Martin wrote:Excellent news!
Welcome back James P. This forum was a worse-off place without thee.
As far as I'm aware, this was all it was about. I personally would agree that admitting to fancying certain underage actresses on a public website is, at best, highly questionable behaviour.
I guess you're free to discuss the well-known member, but I shan't be mentioning him any more by name.
Not quite, no.Dr Lobster* wrote:
so in the two or three days since you left the forum for the second time, you've also had a new brain installed?