Page 9 of 844
Posted: Wed 25 Oct, 2006 21.34
by Alarsne53
Not The Chef wrote:Well yes. But you don't know me. I mean you're probably a paedophile, nobody knows.
Your quite right, I do NOT know you personally, but I fear that if your comments are in anyway indicative of the real you (and not just because you have the safety of sitting behind a pc screen) then I was quite justified in my original comments.
Moving on to the second part, on record I categorically can state I am NOT a paedophile, and to be honest I am appalled to the highest degree that you even considered using such an abhorrent and damaging condition in the point you were making. What if I were in a position of trust with children, such as being a teacher? Admittedly I am signed up to this forum under an alias, but nevertheless it is potentially a life wrecking allegation.
Posted: Wed 25 Oct, 2006 21.55
by Not The Chef
Charlie Wells wrote:Not The Chef wrote:Well yes. But you don't know me. I mean you're probably a paedophile, nobody knows.
Is that "in your opinion" or are you verging on slander by suggesting that someone may be a paedophile. Being branded a 'muppet' and a 'probable paedophile' are on completely different levels.
It's actually libel you're accusing me off.
Posted: Wed 25 Oct, 2006 22.01
by marksi
Not The Chef wrote:Charlie Wells wrote:Not The Chef wrote:Well yes. But you don't know me. I mean you're probably a paedophile, nobody knows.
Is that "in your opinion" or are you verging on slander by suggesting that someone may be a paedophile. Being branded a 'muppet' and a 'probable paedophile' are on completely different levels.
It's actually libel you're accusing me off.
Indeed he is, and even though you've dressed it up to make it a bit unclear and speculative, if you weren't to withdraw the statement or conversely provide some evidence to back it up, you'd be guilty of it.
Posted: Wed 25 Oct, 2006 22.32
by Not The Chef
...
Posted: Mon 30 Oct, 2006 17.43
by Pete
WALLS VIENETTA
pad is annoying me down in mocks
http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22726
He and his yes men followers need dealt with, SEVERELY
Posted: Mon 30 Oct, 2006 18.49
by Jake
Very nice mock you did there Hymagumba
Posted: Mon 30 Oct, 2006 18.52
by Lorns
It's turning in your favour.
Posted: Wed 01 Nov, 2006 14.31
by Pete
why has babyben99 still not been dealt with?
Posted: Wed 01 Nov, 2006 14.48
by Gavin Scott
Hymagumba wrote:why has babyben99 still not been dealt with?
He has - he's been banned.
Nice work, mods.
Posted: Wed 01 Nov, 2006 15.49
by Pete
benben99 wrote:Newest member: Saruxi, joining 3588. In total there are 41 users online: 9 Registered, 5 Hidden and 27 Guests. Most users ever online was 294 on 7 Feb 2005 2:35 pmTV Forumers visiting: BBC WORLD, benben99, cdukjunkie, Hymagumba, Jammy432, marksi, pmg124, StevieB, Tellybox
We are going to try and break the TV Forum Record and get 300 users online at once. This may seem silly, but, is we get 300 people on the site at once then tv forum will have broken a tv record! Yes there is a special TV Related Forums max people on line at one time and the current score is 299 by some usa site. We can beat that.
We are going to have two attempts, one THIS SATURDAY AT 21.00 AND THEN IF WE HAVEN'T BEETEN IT ANOTHER AT MID-DAY THIS SUNDAY
IF WE DO BRAEK IT AS A REGISTERD JUDGE OF THE TV RELATED FORUMS AWARD I WILL BE ISSUEING ASA AN AWARD, AND A LINK TO PUT ON THE SITE, LINKING THE THE ON-LINE AWARD. ASA WILL ALSO GET A SPECIAL AWARD WITH THE DETAILS ON IT.
NOTE: I WILL TAKE THE READINGS AT: 20.59, 21.00, 21.01, 21.02 ON SATURDAY AND AT 11.59, 12.00, 12.01 ON SUNDAY.
ALL TIMES GMT
BE THERE 
sorry, this post is so marvellously preposterous i had to save it
oh and don't forget the classic
benben99 wrote:it seems to me that you guys love tv more than your wives. I'm leaving
wives? who has one of those on TVF?
Posted: Sat 04 Nov, 2006 22.44
by B.E. El-Zebub
Joe Havard wrote:Hymagumba wrote:Joe Havard wrote:Tomorrow is his verdict? Let's just hope that man gets what he deserves.
you're a judge now too?
:roll:
